[arch-general] Kernel source URL change
artafinde at gmail.com
Thu Aug 2 05:28:18 UTC 2018
On 01/08/18, Andrey Vihrov via arch-general wrote:
> Recently the way kernel sources are retrieved was changed in the linux
> package . Now the sources are fetched from
> I see a few problems with this:
> - Previously the list of applied patches was very transparent. You could
> immediately see that the kernel and kernel patch tarballs come from
> kernel.org, and view individual extra patches. Now the code comes from a
> non-kernel source, and cannot be verified as easily.
> - Previously, if a new kernel version is released and is not yet in the
> repos, you could more or less take the official linux PKGBUILD, change
> one number and build it yourself. With the new layout it is not clear
> how to achieve this.
> - An often cited Arch policy is to use software as released by upstream
> with minimal patching. What becomes of this policy if one of the core
> packages builds from a technical fork instead of upstream?
> If the patches from kernel.org will no longer be signed, as announced in
> , then an alternative would be git tags from  and . It's
> understandable if it may make development harder, nonetheless it would
> allow for better transparency and follow upstream closer — just one
> user's opinion.
>  https://www.kernel.org/minor-changes-to-tarball-release-format.html
>  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/
>  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
Also now to build the package locally you download the whole repository
(~2 Gb compared to the ~110 Mb previously).
What's the reasoning behind this change?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
More information about the arch-general