[arch-general] Any objections to asking vim to fix PKGBUILD syntax highlighting?

[Daniel M. Capella]

> (Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 06:26:45AM -0500) james harvey via arch-general :
> > I'd like to post the following issue at: https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/new
> > 
> > Wanted to see if there were any objections from staff, like if even
> > though the error highlighting is technically wrong, if it's desired to
> > be left as-is to discourage 'pkgname' being a single element array or
> > 'SKIP' usage when inappropriate, etc.
> 
> Hi James, I think you’re targetting the wrong project:
> immae at immae ~ $ pacman -Qo /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax/PKGBUILD.vim
> /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax/PKGBUILD.vim is owned by pacman-contrib 1.1.0-1
> 
> PKGBUILD probably doesn’t exist in vim’s project ;)
> -- 
> Ismael

One of the team intends to do a complete rewrite the syntax file with a
"Vim master". :)

--
Best,
polyzen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20190306/16633c40/attachment-0001.sig>