[arch-general] Suggestion: switch to zstd -19 for compressing packages over xz
Jelle van der Waa
jelle at vdwaa.nl
Sun Mar 17 13:29:19 UTC 2019
On 03/16/19 at 10:59pm, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> On 16/03/2019 13:24, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> > suggest replacing xz with lzip as xz has quite a few flaws in its file format.
> I seem to remember that this has been debunked/ruled out as irrelevant
> to package distribution every time it has been proposed to Debian, e.g.
> it even has worse decompression times then xz.
Apart from that, we have other important factors:
* Is the archiving format reproducible, this is important for
* zstd has been discussed in #archlinux-pacman some time ago but no
descision has been taken yet.
To be quite honest I don't believe this is one of the most pressing
issues in Arch :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the arch-general