[arch-general] teapot package could be improved

[Jude DaShiell]

Thanks for your work on that PKGBUILD.  The package does build.  One
warning mbslen declared implicitly did you mean mblen came up just
before it built worksheet other warnings are for developers came up
earlier and those two were identical.  The executeable must have a name
different than teapot as shown in the synopsis part of the man page
since after building teapot wasn't found in files that could be run.

On Thu, 9 Apr 2020, Rafael Fontenelle wrote:

> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 07:56:27
> From: Rafael Fontenelle <rafaelff at gnome.org>
> Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general at archlinux.org>
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general at archlinux.org>
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] teapot package could be improved
>
> Jude,
>
> I managed to build teapot but setting LDFLAGS and CLAGS to correctly
> point to libtirpc. I also made some other minor improvements, and
> posted on the comments in the AUR page.
>
> If you want to try my PKGBUILD, see: http://ix.io/2hkp|
>
> Em qua., 8 de abr. de 2020 ?s 20:45, Jude DaShiell
> <jdashiel at panix.com> escreveu:
> >
> > that package won't even build with libtirpc though it got a little
> > further this time.  I was curious about this package but can use it on
> > another version of Linux I run to check it out.
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 19:21:37
> > > From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel at panix.com>
> > > Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general at archlinux.org>
> > > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general at archlinux.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [arch-general] teapot package could be improved
> > >
> > > thanks, I will try to take teapot further and see where it crashes.
> > > This is keenerd's package if I'm not much mistaken.  If that developer
> > > is no longer in circulation maybe the package needs flagged as outdated.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020, Lone_Wolf wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 19:01:06
> > > > From: Lone_Wolf <lone_wolf at klaas-de-kat.nl>
> > > > Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general at archlinux.org>
> > > > To: arch-general at archlinux.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [arch-general] teapot package could be improved
> > > >
> > > > Jude uses TalkingArch, logging in on AUR and adding comments may be near
> > > > impossible.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jude, I've checked the files and it looks like teapot needs rpc/types.h and
> > > > rpc/xdr.h .
> > > >
> > > > The libtirpc package has those files but installing it doesn't help.
> > > >
> > > > The sourcecode for teapot is from 2012 and the package was never updated after
> > > > initial upload in 2015.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Maybe https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sc-im/? is an alternative ?
> > > >
> > > > It's a ncurses spreadsheet / calculator .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lone_Wolf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 08-04-2020 23:26, brent s. wrote:
> > > > > On 4/8/20 17:24, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > > > >> which package has the version of rpc.h teapot needs to build?
> > > > >> Whichever package that is, the dependency is missing from the build
> > > > >> script.
> > > > >>
> > > > > You should probably instead post this on the AUR package's comment
> > > > > section, as it is an AUR package and the maintainer is much more likely
> > > > > to notice it there.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/teapot/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
>

--