[arch-general] NFS "updates"?
hf at spg.tu-darmstadt.de
Mon Apr 27 19:15:33 UTC 2020
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:25:59 +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos via
> On 27/04/20, Hauke Fath wrote:
>> Re-reading, this is an Arch decision -- what is the rationale? Can
>> anybody point me to a related discussion?
> It's not, it just defaults to "Y",
-- which requires building your own kernel to change, right?
> see patch in
> There's also a bit of explanation if it's useful
Yes, it is - actually, nfs(5) has a much longer explanation, as well as
a viable workaround: Shorten the udp fragment reassembly timeout on
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:12:17 +0200, Markus Schaaf via arch-general
>> It's a kernel configuration which is introduced with 5.6 kernel. In my
> Wow! I'd say udp is used a lot with nfsvers=3. That will break many nfs3
I (and my users) certainly would appreciate if the decision could be
The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath
() No HTML/RTF in email Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
/\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt
Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-21344
More information about the arch-general