[arch-general] NFS "updates"?

[Amin Vakil]

> 
>> But to tell the users to discuss this upstream is bad advice. This is a
>> situation where a distribution should take corrective action by
>> reverting this configuration. This would add value and remove some
>> useless code from the kernel.
> No. If you want a distribution whose maintainers think it is a good
> think to "correct" upstream decisions, you should use not Arch.
> 

So there isn't a single package in Arch Linux which trusted users have
changed them in order to fix an issue which they thought it's better
this way?

If there is/was a package what is/was it and why?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20200430/95643dd1/attachment.sig>