[arch-general] Thunderbird 78

[Franck STAUFFER]

Shouldn't it be the opposite?
This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people 
want older package they have to package it themselves in AUR.
Am I wrong?

On 8/15/20 5:27 AM, karx via arch-general wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020, 9:45 PM mpan <archml-y1vf3axu at mpan.pl> wrote:
> 
>>> Is there any reason the package is stuck to version 68?
>>    The reason is given on the very top of the page you have linked.
>>
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't we package thunderbird 78 in
> something like testing or the AUR for people who absolutely need 78, and
> then keep the stable version how it is?
> 
> Yash
> 
>>

-- 
Franck STAUFFER
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20200815/6959ce66/attachment.sig>