[arch-general] "npm" package issues
minshall at umich.edu
Wed Nov 4 19:07:47 UTC 2020
> The files should definitely be owned, though... I suspect your issue
> is due to upgrading the pacman version, resulting in some files that
> could not be deleted due to not existing, but were not part of the new
> package and therefore did not exist afterward either.
thanks. in theory (modulo fat fingers), the only files i *removed* were
ones that [pacman -Qo] said were unowned. and, *those* files were
unowned post [pacman -Syu].
a time machine would help. absent that, again, i guess we'll "let that
mystery be". thanks again.
More information about the arch-general