[arch-general] conflict on /usr/bin generated by tigervnc?
Javier
j.e.vasquez.v at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 00:53:55 UTC 2020
On 9/9/20 5:59 PM, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:41:28 -0600
> Javier via arch-general <arch-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi !
>>
>> On Today's upgrade:
>>
>> % pacman -Syu
>> :: Synchronizing package databases...
>> ...
>> Packages (9) ... tigervnc-1.11.0-1 ...
>> ...
>> tigervnc-1.11.0-1-x86_64 131.3 MiB 3.51 MiB/s 00:37 [########################################################] 100%
>> (9/9) checking keys in keyring [########################################################] 100%
>> (9/9) checking package integrity [########################################################] 100%
>> (9/9) loading package files [########################################################] 100%
>> (9/9) checking for file conflicts [########################################################] 100%
>> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
>> tigervnc: /usr/sbin exists in filesystem (owned by filesystem)
>> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
>>
>> Usually that get fixed by using "--overwrite /usr/sbin". But I find it wrong for tigervnc to own "/usr/sbin", so I think in this case tigervnc is not right. Would this be the case, or it's OK for tigervnc to be the owner and then to overwrite?
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>
> NO! DO NOT OVERWRITE! In fact, never overwrite when the file is owned by
> another package, you'll just create more problems. This is a packaging bug, and
> this package is currently uninstallable on Arch.
>
> Scimmia
>
Understood ! Actually I thought it to be dangerous for sure !
Thanks !
--
Javier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20200909/ca23e5f7/attachment.sig>
More information about the arch-general
mailing list