[arch-general] Link libutil.so not in glibc 2.35-2.

[Doug Newgard]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 19:16:17 +0100
SET via arch-general <arch-general at lists.archlinux.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I ran into an issue building an application that complained libutil.so was
> not found. It's not in /usr/lib indeed with glibc 2.35-2, while it was a link
> to libutil.so.1 -> libutil-2.32.so in glibc 2.32. Just creating the link
> fixed the build issue.
> 
> I'm wondering if it's a new library deployment scheme, or it the link was 
> missed during packaging.
> 
> Regards.

If you're wondering if upstream did something, the first thing you should do is
check the release notes.

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-August/129718.html