[arch-general] User-Submitted Package Updates (how it could possibly work)

[George Rawlinson]

On 22-01-17 15:07, Vasi Vilvoiu via arch-general wrote:
> What is the planned timeline for this migration? IMHO it would do a great
> deal of good to the community to (a) communicate these plans clearly and (b)
> communicate where help is needed and how the community can pitch in.

I'm going to be blunt here; there is no timeline. Arch is a volunteer
effort.

It's a significant effort that requires a *lot* of changes/testing to
our internal tooling/infrastructure. The people actually responsible for
it will probably chime in at some point, but don't expect them to. :p

--
George Rawlinson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20220118/537c7001/attachment.sig>