[arch-general] boot magically mounted on startup; reliable?

james james at jamescm.co.uk
Tue Jul 26 08:43:13 UTC 2022


On 22/07/26 09:34am, Vasile Vilvoiu via arch-general wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On my latest install I forgot to mount the boot partition during the
> installation process, which prompted me to come back on a few of the steps
> after setting up the root filesystem.
> 
> Everything works great (with systemd-boot) but I just remembered one thing I
> missed was adding an entry in fstab for /boot. However, it does seem that
> systemd does mount _something_ automatically:
> 
> $ mount | grep boot
> systemd-1 on /boot type autofs (rw,relatime,fd=50,pgrp=1,timeout=120,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct,pipe_ino=10794)
> 
> and that _something_ seems to be the same as the boot partition:
> 
> $ sudo ls -al /boot
> total 58408
> drwx------  5 root root     4096 Jan  1  1970  .
> drwxr-xr-x 17 root root     4096 Jul  9 11:02  ..
> drwx------  5 root root     4096 Jul  9 10:54  EFI
> drwx------  2 root root     4096 Jul  9 21:55 'System Volume Information'
> -rwx------  1 root root 34938914 Jul 19 18:14  initramfs-linux-fallback.img
> -rwx------  1 root root  9030240 Jul 19 18:14  initramfs-linux.img
> -rwx------  1 root root  5174272 May 10 21:27  intel-ucode.img
> drwx------  3 root root     4096 Jul 26 08:47  loader
> -rwx------  1 root root 10636800 Jul 19 18:14  vmlinuz-linux
> 
> $ sudo mount /dev/nvme1n1p1 /mnt
> 
> $ sudo ls -al /mnt
> total 58408
> drwx------  5 root root     4096 Jan  1  1970  .
> drwxr-xr-x 17 root root     4096 Jul  9 11:02  ..
> drwx------  5 root root     4096 Jul  9 10:54  EFI
> drwx------  2 root root     4096 Jul  9 21:55 'System Volume Information'
> -rwx------  1 root root 34938914 Jul 19 18:14  initramfs-linux-fallback.img
> -rwx------  1 root root  9030240 Jul 19 18:14  initramfs-linux.img
> -rwx------  1 root root  5174272 May 10 21:27  intel-ucode.img
> drwx------  3 root root     4096 Jul 26 08:47  loader
> -rwx------  1 root root 10636800 Jul 19 18:14  vmlinuz-linux
> 
> 
> I have trouble finding the documentation of this behavior and I'd like to
> know if it can be relied upon or I should add an entry manually.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Vasile Vilvoiu

Hi,

I'm not sure about the automatic behaviour either but I tend to think you should probably do this manually. It shouldn't cause any problems, and it could help avert problems if this automatic behaviour turns out not to be reliable.


More information about the arch-general mailing list