[arch-ports] integration of ports into original archlinux

Jason Chu jason at archlinux.org
Mon Aug 8 15:49:18 EDT 2005

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 05:40:26PM +0200, Alexander Baldeck wrote:
> hey list,
> i am wondering about this quite some time now:
> how will ports be handled by the main archlinux project for i686? as it seems there hasn't been much talk 
> about
> this lately but a while ago Judd moved the repos to a new structure (os/i686) which seems to be a first 
> step. since
> then i haven't heard much.
> now then, i simply want to start another discussion. maybe to find a few things a port has to implement 
> before it
> may be officially mentioned or even why they should not be considered as a part of the official 
> archlinux.
> regards,
> alex

I planned on talking about this when I got the inclination.  I expect I'll
be able to "force" myself to do it tonight, after I finish the conference
for the day.


If you understand, things are just as they are.  If you do not understand,
things are just as they are.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-ports/attachments/20050808/0596f06a/attachment.pgp>

More information about the arch-ports mailing list