From syamajala at gamebox.net Thu Dec 1 14:52:27 2005 From: syamajala at gamebox.net (seshu yamajala) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:52:27 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Who's working on Arch64 packages? In-Reply-To: <7ecb79cc0511290831l37015682j@mail.gmail.com> References: <7ecb79cc0511290831l37015682j@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:31 AM, Dusty Phillips wrote: > Hey all, > > I think it might also be useful to discuss who's working on what. We > don't have enough devs yet to assign specific people to specific > packages like the Arch core team does, and each of us has different > levels of experience (I, for example generally give up if I can't get > it to compile within a few tries and a half-assed google search for 64 > bit patches.....). > c14n was considering starting a private or public (don't remember which one) mailing for this, but i suggested we use this mailing list. > Lets also start a list of what needs to be worked on. Perhaps this > should be put in a wiki page so we can all maintain it: > > Packages needing updating: > nontrivial: > kernel26 > initscripts i'd like to add the nvidia drivers to the list. I don't know that much about the ati stuff... gnome is also pretty big, but i think i could handle parts of it. - syamajala From jason at archlinux.org Thu Dec 1 16:04:27 2005 From: jason at archlinux.org (Jason Chu) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:04:27 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Who's working on Arch64 packages? In-Reply-To: References: <7ecb79cc0511290831l37015682j@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20051201210427.GC16322@mercury.xentac.net> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 02:52:27PM -0500, seshu yamajala wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:31 AM, Dusty Phillips wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > I think it might also be useful to discuss who's working on what. We > > don't have enough devs yet to assign specific people to specific > > packages like the Arch core team does, and each of us has different > > levels of experience (I, for example generally give up if I can't get > > it to compile within a few tries and a half-assed google search for 64 > > bit patches.....). > > > > c14n was considering starting a private or public (don't remember > which one) mailing for this, but i suggested we use this mailing list. Yes, please use this mailing list. That's what it's for. Jason -- If you understand, things are just as they are. If you do not understand, things are just as they are. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From terakuma at imbris.net Thu Dec 1 15:36:12 2005 From: terakuma at imbris.net (Maluvia) Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:36:12 -0800 Subject: [arch-ports] Who's working on Arch64 packages? In-Reply-To: References: <7ecb79cc0511290831l37015682j@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200512011236120630.004BE3A0@mail.imbris.net> I was hoping to contribute these pkgs myself, but as I cannot compile anything atm, I would like to add the following to the wish list: raptor ardour ladspa alsa-tools BTW, could someone explain to me why we cannot just put all the 64bit libs in lib rather than lib64, (and use lib32 for later multilib expansion)? Thanks From syamajala at gamebox.net Sat Dec 3 09:07:59 2005 From: syamajala at gamebox.net (seshu yamajala) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:07:59 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Who's working on Arch64 packages? In-Reply-To: <200512011236120630.004BE3A0@mail.imbris.net> References: <7ecb79cc0511290831l37015682j@mail.gmail.com> <200512011236120630.004BE3A0@mail.imbris.net> Message-ID: <0576885B-035D-4FC9-BC21-789944415D26@gamebox.net> On Dec 1, 2005, at 3:36 PM, Maluvia wrote: > > BTW, could someone explain to me why we cannot just put all the > 64bit libs in lib rather than lib64, (and use lib32 for later > multilib expansion)? > Ok, so the reason things are done the way they are right now is because I followed debian on amd64. They use the symlink and for 32bit backwards compatibility they setup a chroot. To me this seems like a much better idea than packaging both 32bit and 64bit apps for arch64. Also the symlink is supposed to be the other way around from / lib64 to /lib i've been meaning to fix that... From ganja.guru at touchtelindia.net Sat Dec 3 13:37:46 2005 From: ganja.guru at touchtelindia.net (ganja.guru) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:07:46 +0530 Subject: [arch-ports] Who's working on Arch64 packages? In-Reply-To: <20051201210427.GC16322@mercury.xentac.net> References: <7ecb79cc0511290831l37015682j@mail.gmail.com> <20051201210427.GC16322@mercury.xentac.net> Message-ID: <4391E5FA.1000402@touchtelindia.net> If you want to install arch64, just read the wiki at http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_Install_page.. I'm not sure if the ISO is updated though, so manually downloading the packages and installing them is probably the best way to go for now. As for stability, I'm running arch64 stable for a month now without any issues whatsoever ( yes, nvidia drivers too). Flash doesn't work, so be prepared to install the ultra useful flashblock extension ; ) I'll resume contributing once the server issues are sorted out. When I last updated, I changed the initscripts so that at boot up you should get "Arch Linux 64 0.7.1 'Noodle' " or something similar. syamajala please let me know if you want to call it Arch Linux 64 0.1 or whatever and ill modify it. Great to see things finally picking up Varun 'ganja_guru' Acharya P.S - sorry about double posting, I chose the wrong SMTP ; ) From terakuma at imbris.net Sat Dec 3 13:51:36 2005 From: terakuma at imbris.net (Maluvia) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:51:36 -0800 Subject: [arch-ports] Who's working on Arch64 packages? In-Reply-To: <0576885B-035D-4FC9-BC21-789944415D26@gamebox.net> References: <7ecb79cc0511290831l37015682j@mail.gmail.com> <200512011236120630.004BE3A0@mail.imbris.net> <0576885B-035D-4FC9-BC21-789944415D26@gamebox.net> Message-ID: <200512031051360890.0038EF5C@mail.imbris.net> >Ok, so the reason things are done the way they are right now is >because I followed debian on amd64. They use the symlink and for >32bit backwards compatibility they setup a chroot. To me this seems >like a much better idea than packaging both 32bit and 64bit apps for >arch64. I agree that Arch64 would be better with 32bit apps left for chroot or statically linked. Pure64 is much cleaner and simpler. >Also the symlink is supposed to be the other way around from /lib64 to /lib >i've been meaning to fix that... That makes much more sense to me - I will do a reinstall that way and see how it works. Thanks for the clarification. From driadan at willinux.net Sat Dec 3 19:29:58 2005 From: driadan at willinux.net (Guillermo Vaya) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 01:29:58 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Sharing /home between archlinux and arch64 Message-ID: <43923886.40600@willinux.net> I have recently set up my arch64 on an AMD64 Turion and I have previously installed archlinux. My doubt is if I can use the same partition for /home (I plan to use different users so one doesn't interfere with the other) I suppose there is no problem, but I wanted to be sure before I try. thanks Guillermo Vay? (aka Driadan) -- "I see connected people" - The seventh sense Registered Linux User #378439 Willinux.net - Pagina Williblog - Mi Blog personal From buchuki at gmail.com Sat Dec 3 19:45:07 2005 From: buchuki at gmail.com (Dusty Phillips) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 19:45:07 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Sharing /home between archlinux and arch64 In-Reply-To: <43923886.40600@willinux.net> References: <43923886.40600@willinux.net> Message-ID: <7ecb79cc0512031645y304247d6u@mail.gmail.com> I share my /home, so it can work. :-) Dusty On 03/12/05, Guillermo Vaya wrote: > I have recently set up my arch64 on an AMD64 Turion and I have > previously installed archlinux. > My doubt is if I can use the same partition for /home (I plan to use > different users so one doesn't interfere with the other) > > I suppose there is no problem, but I wanted to be sure before I try. > > thanks > Guillermo Vay? (aka Driadan) > -- > "I see connected people" - The seventh sense > > Registered Linux User #378439 > Willinux.net - Pagina > Williblog - Mi Blog personal > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > From driadan at willinux.net Sat Dec 3 19:42:48 2005 From: driadan at willinux.net (Guillermo Vaya) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 01:42:48 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Sharing /home between archlinux and arch64 In-Reply-To: <7ecb79cc0512031645y304247d6u@mail.gmail.com> References: <43923886.40600@willinux.net> <7ecb79cc0512031645y304247d6u@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <43923B88.90407@willinux.net> Thanks, I'll share it right now :) Dusty Phillips wrote: >I share my /home, so it can work. :-) > >Dusty > > > >On 03/12/05, Guillermo Vaya wrote: > > >>I have recently set up my arch64 on an AMD64 Turion and I have >>previously installed archlinux. >>My doubt is if I can use the same partition for /home (I plan to use >>different users so one doesn't interfere with the other) >> >>I suppose there is no problem, but I wanted to be sure before I try. >> >>thanks >>Guillermo Vay? (aka Driadan) >>-- >>"I see connected people" - The seventh sense >> >>Registered Linux User #378439 >>Willinux.net - Pagina >>Williblog - Mi Blog personal >> >>_______________________________________________ >>arch-ports mailing list >>arch-ports at archlinux.org >>http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >arch-ports mailing list >arch-ports at archlinux.org >http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > -- "I see connected people" - The seventh sense Registered Linux User #378439 Willinux.net - Pagina Williblog - Mi Blog personal From syamajala at gamebox.net Sat Dec 3 20:24:44 2005 From: syamajala at gamebox.net (seshu yamajala) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:24:44 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Sharing /home between archlinux and arch64 In-Reply-To: <43923B88.90407@willinux.net> References: <43923886.40600@willinux.net> <7ecb79cc0512031645y304247d6u@mail.gmail.com> <43923B88.90407@willinux.net> Message-ID: <8AC914A4-8D44-4E2C-B028-133075CA5948@gamebox.net> i share my /home between 4 systems using samba. From aba at disipos.de Tue Dec 6 19:32:20 2005 From: aba at disipos.de (Alexander Baldeck) Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:32:20 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] ArchLinux PPC News Message-ID: <43962D94.5080902@disipos.de> Hello list, once again we have some news I thought they would be worth to be mentioned: 1) archlinuxppc.org has arrived It took a while for me to consider my options and now I have found an affordable solution that will fit our needs perfectly. The new server is more or less set and all major services are migrated. Web: http://www.archlinuxppc.org (needs some more work though) CVS: The following are available: CVSROOT=":pserver:anonymous at cvs.archlinuxppc.org:/home/cvs-current" / MODULE: current CVSROOT=":pserver:anonymous at cvs.archlinuxppc.org:/home/cvs-extra" / MODULE: extra We have implemented a similar way of doing things by tagging CURRENT or TESTING analog to what the i686 guys invented, that means "testing" became obsolete and was merged with "current" and tagged accordingly. FTP: All packages including ISO-snapshots are available via anonymous-ftp from here: ftp://ftp.archlinuxppc.org It might take a while until I have done a Pacman package with the new list, for now the few of you using ArchPPC should edit their lists manually. RSYNC: The module structure staid the same but the domain has changed so feel free to use: archlinuxppc.org::archppc-current archlinuxppc.org::archppc-extra and last but not least: archlinuxppc.org::archppc-testing 2) PowerMac kernel now implements INITRD changes I have made the effort to integrate mkinitrd and all necessary changes to the kernel26-pmac package. For now it seem more or less stable. Glad that tpowa and apeiro did such a great job, huge thanks goes out to both of them. By the way, hwdetect and network-profiles are there as well and work perfectly. 3) Welcome aboard benoitc! He was of great help setting up CVS on the new server, reporting bugs and making suggestions. Also he has been working on G4 specific issues with Firefox and Gnome. Having said that, he plans to contribute the wonderful GNOME which hopefully will attract more people to run Arch on PPC. Let's all cheer for him. ;) 4) What's next? Now that we have all services migrated to the new server, I hope we can catch up with the regular tasks and upgrade to the latest packages in order not to fall behind i686 too much. Right now Xorg 6.9RC3 and firefox 1.5 are in the making and will arrive on the repos shortly. On top of that, I have received word from cnuke today, that there finally is the much anticipated opensource driver for the Airport Xtreme (TM) widely used in iBooks and PowerBooks. I will see about how to integrate them, maybe this could be done much better by benoitc or elkrammer since both own *Books? ;) Well, that's all folks. May the force be with you and good luck with whatever you do right now. Best regards, -kth5 From Dieter at Rethmeyers.de Mon Dec 12 14:25:15 2005 From: Dieter at Rethmeyers.de (Dieter Rethmeyer) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:25:15 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Development of Arch64 / site arch64.org still down Message-ID: <439DCE9B.40402@Rethmeyers.de> Hello, I am a new arch64 user and I am interested in making Arch64 an good, perhaps the best 64-bit distribution. At the moment I am using Arch32 as some applications are not available in Arch64, so I try to compile them here (with more or less success). My base Arch64 system is running and digikam works already :) What about arch64.org? - it is still down. Do you know when the site will be up again? Another question about package updates: Will updates still be made with pacman in Arch64 or ist there another solution planned? And, at last: If I suceed in compiling some programs I use (just working on digikam and postfix - having trouble with mc, acroread, openoffice.org2) - are you interested in the results (PKGBUILDs, binaries, problems I have)? Shall compilation problems and possible solutions be discussed on this mailing list? Dieter From a.radke at arcor.de Mon Dec 12 14:33:04 2005 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:33:04 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Development of Arch64 / site arch64.org still down In-Reply-To: <439DCE9B.40402@Rethmeyers.de> References: <439DCE9B.40402@Rethmeyers.de> Message-ID: <439DD070.5000006@arcor.de> Dieter Rethmeyer schrieb: >Hello, > >I am a new arch64 user and I am interested in making Arch64 an good, >perhaps the best 64-bit distribution. At the moment I am using Arch32 as >some applications are not available in Arch64, so I try to compile them >here (with more or less success). My base Arch64 system is running and >digikam works already :) > >What about arch64.org? - it is still down. Do you know when the site >will be up again? > >Another question about package updates: Will updates still be made with >pacman in Arch64 or ist there another solution planned? > >And, at last: If I suceed in compiling some programs I use (just working >on digikam and postfix - having trouble with mc, acroread, >openoffice.org2) - are you interested in the results (PKGBUILDs, >binaries, problems I have)? Shall compilation problems and possible >solutions be discussed on this mailing list? > >Dieter > >_______________________________________________ >arch-ports mailing list >arch-ports at archlinux.org >http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > > The site is up: http://arch64.org/ Let?s meet in irc #archlinux64 AndyRTR From syamajala at gamebox.net Wed Dec 21 20:37:53 2005 From: syamajala at gamebox.net (seshu yamajala) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:37:53 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] testing repo Message-ID: we finally started a testing repo for arch64. there is now a kernel26 package in it and some other things by andytr. ganja_guru has also made a good number of updates to current. things are moving along. a little slowly but their moving. hopefully i'll have sometime during my christmas vacation to do things. - syamajala From acousino at math.ksu.edu Thu Dec 22 21:28:40 2005 From: acousino at math.ksu.edu (Drew Cousino) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:28:40 -0600 (CST) Subject: [arch-ports] troubles Message-ID: <34968.69.254.238.127.1135304920.squirrel@www.math.ksu.edu> I have two problems: one with the nvidia package and the other with pacman. Nvidia problem: I cannot install the nvidia package. I always run into the error that the installer cannot find /usr/lib/libGL.so.1, and yet it exists in my filesystem. Pacman problem: Whenever I run pacman -Syu, it asks me to update libpcap to version 0.8.3-1. However, pacman -Q libpcap says that I already have that version installed. Also I have found the following packages install with unaltered abs PKGBUILDs: acroread 7.0.1-1 apcupsd 3.10.18-1 aspell-en 6.0-1 lesstif 0.94.4-3 libdvdcss 1.2.9-2 libwmf 0.2.8.4-1 vorbis-tools 1.1.1-1 xine-ui 0.99.4-1 xmms-skins 0.3-1 I should note that xpdf requires lesstif, but lesstif isn't in the 64 bit repo. Drew From aba at disipos.de Fri Dec 23 03:36:02 2005 From: aba at disipos.de (Alexander Baldeck) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:36:02 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] troubles In-Reply-To: <34968.69.254.238.127.1135304920.squirrel@www.math.ksu.edu> References: <34968.69.254.238.127.1135304920.squirrel@www.math.ksu.edu> Message-ID: <43ABB6F2.4010809@disipos.de> Please spare the users here the hassle to read all of the message down to the last sentence to find out it's x86_64 you're talking about. :-) Drew Cousino wrote: >I have two problems: one with the nvidia package and the other with pacman. > >Nvidia problem: I cannot install the nvidia package. I always run into >the error that the installer cannot find /usr/lib/libGL.so.1, and yet it >exists in my filesystem. > > > Still, it's probably only a symlink to /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.* >Pacman problem: Whenever I run pacman -Syu, it asks me to update libpcap >to version 0.8.3-1. However, pacman -Q libpcap says that I already have >that version installed. > > Filename and pkgver conflict, a probably hand editied binary package. Cheers! Alex From pansyg at gmx.at Sat Dec 24 08:43:07 2005 From: pansyg at gmx.at (Gernot Pansy) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:43:07 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] arch64: testing kernel26 Message-ID: <200512241443.07893.pansyg@gmx.at> there is an bug in PKGBUILD in line 62: asm-i386 needs to be changed to asm-x64_64 othwerwise it's immpossible to build the fglrx modul. how to i get an svn account ? i want to help building some packages. i already have made some packges, and i think the are quite useful for the community (ati-drivers, lvm2, ). gernot From mrgreen.linuxuser at virgin.net Sat Dec 24 12:29:22 2005 From: mrgreen.linuxuser at virgin.net (Mr Green) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:29:22 +0000 Subject: [arch-ports] get svn Message-ID: <43AD8572.20707@virgin.net> Hi, Talk to seshu or c14n ... ;-) Welcome to Archlinux64 MrGreen From a.radke at arcor.de Sun Dec 25 03:43:36 2005 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:43:36 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] arch64: testing kernel26 In-Reply-To: <200512241443.07893.pansyg@gmx.at> References: <200512241443.07893.pansyg@gmx.at> Message-ID: <43AE5BB8.1060909@arcor.de> Gernot Pansy schrieb: >there is an bug in PKGBUILD in line 62: > >asm-i386 needs to be changed to asm-x64_64 othwerwise it's immpossible to >build the fglrx modul. > > I?ll fix this soon. Please give more response if all packages from testing are working for you. >how to i get an svn account ? i want to help building some packages. > >i already have made some packges, and i think the are quite useful for the >community (ati-drivers, lvm2, ). > > >gernot > >_______________________________________________ >arch-ports mailing list >arch-ports at archlinux.org >http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > > Mostly we meet in IRC #archlinux64 / irc.freenode.net. Ask c14n for svn+sftp access. AndyRTR From pansyg at gmx.at Sun Dec 25 08:06:26 2005 From: pansyg at gmx.at (Gernot Pansy) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:06:26 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] arch64: testing kernel26 In-Reply-To: <43AE5BB8.1060909@arcor.de> References: <200512241443.07893.pansyg@gmx.at> <43AE5BB8.1060909@arcor.de> Message-ID: <1135515986.11108.250525259@webmail.messagingengine.com> all packages in testing work for me. execpt ndiswrapper compiled against the kernel don't work. i will take a look on this, tomorrow. gernot On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:43:36 +0100, "Andreas Radke" said: > Gernot Pansy schrieb: > > >there is an bug in PKGBUILD in line 62: > > > >asm-i386 needs to be changed to asm-x64_64 othwerwise it's immpossible to > >build the fglrx modul. > > > > > I?ll fix this soon. Please give more response if all packages from > testing are working for you. > > >how to i get an svn account ? i want to help building some packages. > > > >i already have made some packges, and i think the are quite useful for the > >community (ati-drivers, lvm2, ). > > > > > >gernot > > > >_______________________________________________ > >arch-ports mailing list > >arch-ports at archlinux.org > >http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > > > > > > Mostly we meet in IRC #archlinux64 / irc.freenode.net. Ask c14n for > svn+sftp access. > > AndyRTR > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > From a.radke at arcor.de Sun Dec 25 09:42:07 2005 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:42:07 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] arch64: testing kernel26 In-Reply-To: <1135515986.11108.250525259@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <200512241443.07893.pansyg@gmx.at> <43AE5BB8.1060909@arcor.de> <1135515986.11108.250525259@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <43AEAFBF.2010907@arcor.de> Gernot Pansy schrieb: >all packages in testing work for me. >execpt ndiswrapper compiled against the kernel don't work. >i will take a look on this, tomorrow. > >gernot > > New Kernel 2.6.15-rc7 is done. I?ll upload it later tonight. Maybe it?s fixed with that release. AndyRTR From a.radke at arcor.de Sun Dec 25 17:53:49 2005 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:53:49 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] [Arch64] ncurses error fixed In-Reply-To: <439DCE9B.40402@Rethmeyers.de> References: <439DCE9B.40402@Rethmeyers.de> Message-ID: <43AF22FD.7030400@arcor.de> Just use this pkgbuild to fix it! # $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.16 2005/10/26 21:41:58 judd Exp $ # Maintainer: judd pkgname=ncurses pkgver=5.5 pkgrel=2 pkgdesc="A System V Release 4.0 curses emulation library" url="http://www.gnu.org/software/ncurses/ncurses.html" depends=('glibc') install=ncurses.install source=(ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/$pkgname/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz) md5sums=('e73c1ac10b4bfc46db43b2ddfd6244ef') build() { # The chtype/mmask-t settings below are to retain ABI compat # with ncurses-5.4 so dont change em ! cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver ./configure --prefix=/usr \ --with-shared --with-normal --without-debug --without-ada \ --with-install-prefix=$startdir/pkg \ --with-chtype='long' --with-mmask-t='long' make || return 1 make install mkdir -p $startdir/pkg/lib cd $startdir/pkg/usr/lib mv libncurses.so.$pkgver ../../lib ln -sf ../../lib/libncurses.so.$pkgver libncurses.so.$pkgver cd $startdir/pkg/lib ln -sf libncurses.so.$pkgver libncurses.so.5 rm -f $startdir/pkg/lib/libcurses.so # build unicode support libs cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver make clean ./configure --prefix=/usr \ --with-shared --with-normal --without-debug --without-ada \ --with-install-prefix=$startdir/pkg --enable-widec \ --with-chtype='long' --with-mmask-t='long' make || return 1 make install } From a.radke at arcor.de Tue Dec 27 10:27:13 2005 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:27:13 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] arch64: testing kernel26 In-Reply-To: <200512241443.07893.pansyg@gmx.at> References: <200512241443.07893.pansyg@gmx.at> Message-ID: <43B15D51.4020903@arcor.de> Gernot Pansy schrieb: >there is an bug in PKGBUILD in line 62: > >asm-i386 needs to be changed to asm-x64_64 othwerwise it's immpossible to >build the fglrx modul. > >how to i get an svn account ? i want to help building some packages. > >i already have made some packges, and i think the are quite useful for the >community (ati-drivers, lvm2, ). > > >gernot > >_______________________________________________ >arch-ports mailing list >arch-ports at archlinux.org >http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > > I just installed here a new kernel 2-6-15rc7-git1 and I could compile the NVidia driver. Just to let you all know. I still cannot access to sftp. So if anybody needs it quickly just checkout the svn I?ve already updated. AndyRTR From syamajala at gamebox.net Tue Dec 27 17:21:53 2005 From: syamajala at gamebox.net (seshu yamajala) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:21:53 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] arch64: testing kernel26 In-Reply-To: <43B15D51.4020903@arcor.de> References: <200512241443.07893.pansyg@gmx.at> <43B15D51.4020903@arcor.de> Message-ID: On Dec 27, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > I still cannot access to sftp. So if anybody needs it quickly just > checkout the svn I?ve already updated. > I think c14n is away. We probably won't be able to get sftp fixed until after the new year...