From jason at archlinux.org Mon Feb 6 18:10:41 2006 From: jason at archlinux.org (Jason Chu) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:10:41 -0800 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings Message-ID: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> I was talking online with the arch64 guys and we all thought it would be a good idea to have a meeting about official support for ports in archlinux. There are a few things that need to happen in the development process of arch for full support to exist, but with things like pacbuild released everything is a lot closer. I would like to get everyone together who is working on porting archlinux to different architectures (x86_64, ppc, ... anyone else? c64? ;) ) to talk about what I had planned on doing, what has been done, what you all need, etc. Is everyone available for an irc meeting on Feb 19, 2006 at 10:00 am PST? Jason -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From aba at disipos.de Mon Feb 6 18:23:40 2006 From: aba at disipos.de (Alexander Baldeck) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:23:40 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings In-Reply-To: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> References: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> Message-ID: <43E7DA7C.8090804@disipos.de> Perfect for me as that's about the time when I have all my clothes in the washing machine and need to stay home. What's so funny about Arch/C64 btw? I have been working on that one! ... Just kidding. ;) Alex / kth5 Jason Chu wrote: > I was talking online with the arch64 guys and we all thought it would > be a good idea to have a meeting about official support for ports in > archlinux. > > There are a few things that need to happen in the development process > of arch for full support to exist, but with things like pacbuild > released everything is a lot closer. > > I would like to get everyone together who is working on porting > archlinux to different architectures (x86_64, ppc, ... anyone else? > c64? ;) ) to talk about what I had planned on doing, what has been done, > what you all need, etc. > > Is everyone available for an irc meeting on Feb 19, 2006 at 10:00 am > PST? > > Jason > From terakuma at imbris.net Mon Feb 6 19:33:25 2006 From: terakuma at imbris.net (Maluvia) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:33:25 -0800 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings In-Reply-To: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> References: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> Message-ID: <200602061633250200.0050235D@mail.imbris.net> Sounds interesting - will try to make it. -Maluvia On 2/6/06 at 3:10 PM Jason Chu wrote: >I was talking online with the arch64 guys and we all thought it would >be a good idea to have a meeting about official support for ports in >archlinux. > >There are a few things that need to happen in the development process >of arch for full support to exist, but with things like pacbuild >released everything is a lot closer. > >I would like to get everyone together who is working on porting >archlinux to different architectures (x86_64, ppc, ... anyone else? >c64? ;) ) to talk about what I had planned on doing, what has been done, >what you all need, etc. > >Is everyone available for an irc meeting on Feb 19, 2006 at 10:00 am >PST? > >Jason > > >_______________________________________________ >arch-ports mailing list >arch-ports at archlinux.org >http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > >__________ NOD32 1.1395 (20060206) Information __________ > >This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >http://www.eset.com From jvinet at zeroflux.org Mon Feb 6 20:17:52 2006 From: jvinet at zeroflux.org (Judd Vinet) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:17:52 -0800 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings In-Reply-To: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> References: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> Message-ID: <20060207011752.GF6616@zeroflux.org> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 03:10:41PM -0800, Jason Chu wrote: > Is everyone available for an irc meeting on Feb 19, 2006 at 10:00 am > PST? I should be able to make that, hangover permitting. - J From Dieter at Rethmeyers.de Tue Feb 7 14:48:37 2006 From: Dieter at Rethmeyers.de (Dieter Rethmeyer) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:48:37 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings In-Reply-To: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> References: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> Message-ID: <43E8F995.2040308@Rethmeyers.de> That's 19:00 (7 pm) in Central Europe, isn't it? I'm interested in participating to improve arch_64 (e. g. contributing packages, perhaps maintaining packages), but couldn't make that date and time. May I ask you to send the results of the meeting to the list? Thanks, dieter__ Jason Chu schrieb am 07.02.2006 00:10: > I was talking online with the arch64 guys and we all thought it would > be a good idea to have a meeting about official support for ports in > archlinux. > > There are a few things that need to happen in the development process > of arch for full support to exist, but with things like pacbuild > released everything is a lot closer. > > I would like to get everyone together who is working on porting > archlinux to different architectures (x86_64, ppc, ... anyone else? > c64? ;) ) to talk about what I had planned on doing, what has been done, > what you all need, etc. > > Is everyone available for an irc meeting on Feb 19, 2006 at 10:00 am > PST? > > Jason > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > From jason at archlinux.org Tue Feb 7 17:08:05 2006 From: jason at archlinux.org (Jason Chu) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:08:05 -0800 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings In-Reply-To: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> References: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> Message-ID: <20060207140805.1a764334@aries> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:10:41 -0800 Jason Chu wrote: > I was talking online with the arch64 guys and we all thought it would > be a good idea to have a meeting about official support for ports in > archlinux. > > There are a few things that need to happen in the development process > of arch for full support to exist, but with things like pacbuild > released everything is a lot closer. > > I would like to get everyone together who is working on porting > archlinux to different architectures (x86_64, ppc, ... anyone else? > c64? ;) ) to talk about what I had planned on doing, what has been > done, what you all need, etc. > > Is everyone available for an irc meeting on Feb 19, 2006 at 10:00 am > PST? > > Jason I forgot to mention that the meeting will be in #archlinux64. Jason -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jason at archlinux.org Tue Feb 7 17:09:03 2006 From: jason at archlinux.org (Jason Chu) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:09:03 -0800 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings In-Reply-To: <43E8F995.2040308@Rethmeyers.de> References: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> <43E8F995.2040308@Rethmeyers.de> Message-ID: <20060207140903.07b85fe3@aries> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:48:37 +0100 Dieter Rethmeyer wrote: > That's 19:00 (7 pm) in Central Europe, isn't it? > > I'm interested in participating to improve arch_64 (e. g. > contributing packages, perhaps maintaining packages), but couldn't > make that date and time. May I ask you to send the results of the > meeting to the list? > > Thanks, dieter__ A log will be taken of the whole thing and minutes from the meeting will also be posted. Jason -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From syamajala at gamebox.net Thu Feb 9 21:55:52 2006 From: syamajala at gamebox.net (seshu yamajala) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:55:52 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings In-Reply-To: <20060207140805.1a764334@aries> References: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> <20060207140805.1a764334@aries> Message-ID: Don't know if any noticed or not, but Jason put the agenda on the wiki. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch-ports_minutes - Seshu -- Archlinux 64bit Project http://arch64.org From syamajala at gamebox.net Thu Feb 9 21:55:52 2006 From: syamajala at gamebox.net (seshu yamajala) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:55:52 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Ports community meetings In-Reply-To: <20060207140805.1a764334@aries> References: <20060206151041.664704cf@aries> <20060207140805.1a764334@aries> Message-ID: Don't know if any noticed or not, but Jason put the agenda on the wiki. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch-ports_minutes - Seshu -- Archlinux 64bit Project http://arch64.org From a.radke at arcor.de Sun Feb 12 12:32:53 2006 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:32:53 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Need help remastering a new installation iso CD Message-ID: <43EF7145.9010804@arcor.de> I don't know who has done our first arch64 install cd. That's a pity because someone told me there's a documentation out. ut nobody has it. As we have now done a few important changes to the boot concept we need to update the install cd. If it will become easier to install arch64 I guess much more user will try to test it. So who can give my some information how to master a nice new ISO cd. A base cd for ftp install should be enough for now. I'm thinking about to start this after the irc meeting next Sunday. AndyRTR From msg431 at gmail.com Sun Feb 12 14:46:12 2006 From: msg431 at gmail.com (matthew g) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:46:12 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] [arch64][pkg req] aspell-en Message-ID: <7ce67b220602121146vff69cbcg653de16067652301@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I used the aspell-en pkgbuild from abs on arch 32bit and add makedepends=('which') The package compiles and works fine as far as I can tell. PKGBUILD: -------------------- # Arch64 # $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.12 2005/06/18 23:12:47 simo Exp $ # Maintainer: Simo Leone # Contributor: Sarah Hay # MSG43 Add mkaedepends pkgname=aspell-en pkgver=6.0 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="English dictionary for aspell" makedepends=('which') depends=('aspell') url="http://aspell.net/" source=(ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/en/aspell6-en-$pkgver-0.tar.bz2) md5sums=('16449e0a266e1ecc526b2f3cd39d4bc2') build() { cd $startdir/src/aspell6-en-$pkgver-0 ./configure /usr/bin/make || return 1 /usr/bin/make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install } -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com From msg431 at gmail.com Mon Feb 13 06:31:36 2006 From: msg431 at gmail.com (matthew g) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:31:36 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] [arch64][bug] cups-1.1.23-5.pkg.tar.gz Message-ID: <7ce67b220602130331g3990231br9d031ba061e80360@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I upgrade to the latest cups version in arch64 but I get a depend issue. cupsd: error while loading shared libraries: libslp.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I can't seeem to find a package with the library. I think this depend belongs to openslp. Anyways you are unable to start/stop cups. In the mean time I downgrade to cups-1.1.23-3.pkg.tar.gz -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com From a.radke at arcor.de Mon Feb 13 10:01:13 2006 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:01:13 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] [arch64][bug] cups-1.1.23-5.pkg.tar.gz In-Reply-To: <7ce67b220602130331g3990231br9d031ba061e80360@mail.gmail.com> References: <7ce67b220602130331g3990231br9d031ba061e80360@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <43F09F39.50900@arcor.de> matthew g schrieb: > Hello, > I upgrade to the latest cups version in arch64 but I get a depend issue. > > cupsd: error while loading shared libraries: libslp.so.1: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > > I can't seeem to find a package with the library. > I think this depend belongs to openslp. > Anyways you are unable to start/stop cups. > In the mean time I downgrade to cups-1.1.23-3.pkg.tar.gz > > -- > Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > Man, you're right! [root at workstation64 andyrtr]# pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 is owned by openslp 1.2.0-2 [root at workstation64 andyrtr]# Please check if this is in arch32 also an error. If so report a bug there. If only arch64 is affected we will fix it soon. AndyRTR From a.radke at arcor.de Mon Feb 13 14:49:40 2006 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:49:40 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Need help remastering a new installation iso CD In-Reply-To: <43EF7145.9010804@arcor.de> References: <43EF7145.9010804@arcor.de> Message-ID: <43F0E2D4.8050103@arcor.de> Andreas Radke schrieb: > I don't know who has done our first arch64 install cd. That's a pity > because someone told me there's a documentation out. ut nobody has it. > As we have now done a few important changes to the boot concept we need > to update the install cd. > > If it will become easier to install arch64 I guess much more user will > try to test it. > > So who can give my some information how to master a nice new ISO cd. A > base cd for ftp install should be enough for now. > > I'm thinking about to start this after the irc meeting next Sunday. > > AndyRTR > > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > I guess I've found the needed infos: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Remastering_the_Install_ISO Will do this when I'm done with basic porting all packages. Still some folders from extra to do. AndyRTR From msg431 at gmail.com Mon Feb 13 16:09:22 2006 From: msg431 at gmail.com (matthew g) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:09:22 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] [arch64][bug] cups-1.1.23-5.pkg.tar.gz In-Reply-To: <43F09F39.50900@arcor.de> References: <7ce67b220602130331g3990231br9d031ba061e80360@mail.gmail.com> <43F09F39.50900@arcor.de> Message-ID: <7ce67b220602131309r78be99a0h4221d94bcc6b8ba0@mail.gmail.com> Umm I will try to do this if I can find some time, I have a hand full of homework plus i also must try to compile mp3splt or a similar tool so I can split the recording of my dads radio show. On 2/13/06, Andreas Radke wrote: > matthew g schrieb: > > Hello, > > I upgrade to the latest cups version in arch64 but I get a depend issue. > > > > cupsd: error while loading shared libraries: libslp.so.1: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > > > I can't seeem to find a package with the library. > > I think this depend belongs to openslp. > > Anyways you are unable to start/stop cups. > > In the mean time I downgrade to cups-1.1.23-3.pkg.tar.gz > > > > -- > > Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch-ports mailing list > > arch-ports at archlinux.org > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > > > > Man, you're right! > > [root at workstation64 andyrtr]# pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 > /usr/lib/libslp.so.1 is owned by openslp 1.2.0-2 > [root at workstation64 andyrtr]# > > Please check if this is in arch32 also an error. If so report a bug > there. If only arch64 is affected we will fix it soon. > > AndyRTR > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com From msg431 at gmail.com Mon Feb 13 22:25:24 2006 From: msg431 at gmail.com (matthew g) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:25:24 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] [arch64][req][pkg] gnome-python + gnome-python-extra w/ depends Message-ID: <7ce67b220602131925o18b50d8eo3a8e3e69cba88da3@mail.gmail.com> Sorry to bug ya but I'd like to see gnome-python and gnome-python-extra with it depends in the repos! I have the packages. Everything built fine using the pkgbuilds from abs. gnome-python-extra depends on -gnome-python depends on those (a few others that are already in the repo) ---gst-plugins-gconf ---totem-plparser ---totem ---gnome-media ---libgksu ---libgksuui I have the pkgs if you want me to I can upload them to my server!. -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com From msg431 at gmail.com Tue Feb 14 16:31:55 2006 From: msg431 at gmail.com (matthew g) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:31:55 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] [arch64]BMP Message-ID: <7ce67b220602141331j2112e939vb6de0eb7bd3f2e6@mail.gmail.com> There is no BMP in arch64 yet so I just thought I'd let the devels now so they can compile it. I used the pkgbuild from arch32. I don't mind doing it myself I just don't have access to the server. -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com From jason at archlinux.org Thu Feb 16 17:42:33 2006 From: jason at archlinux.org (Jason Chu) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:42:33 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Meeting reminder Message-ID: <20060216224233.GB18420@mercury.xentac.net> This message is just to remind everyone of the ports meeting in #archlinux64 at 10:00 AM PST on Feb, 19th. Hope to see you there, Jason -- If you understand, things are just as they are. If you do not understand, things are just as they are. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From benoitc at archlinuxfr.org Thu Feb 16 17:28:34 2006 From: benoitc at archlinuxfr.org (Benoit Chesneau) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:28:34 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Meeting reminder In-Reply-To: <20060216224233.GB18420@mercury.xentac.net> References: <20060216224233.GB18420@mercury.xentac.net> Message-ID: <1140128914.6186.0.camel@marduk.metavers.net> will be here. - Beno?t On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 17:42 -0500, Jason Chu wrote: > This message is just to remind everyone of the ports meeting in > #archlinux64 at 10:00 AM PST on Feb, 19th. > > Hope to see you there, > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports From msg431 at gmail.com Thu Feb 16 20:45:20 2006 From: msg431 at gmail.com (matthew g) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:45:20 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Meeting reminder In-Reply-To: <1140128914.6186.0.camel@marduk.metavers.net> References: <20060216224233.GB18420@mercury.xentac.net> <1140128914.6186.0.camel@marduk.metavers.net> Message-ID: <7ce67b220602161745i31b000fdq7db54591a5a9ddf3@mail.gmail.com> Does this seem about right? 10:00:00 a.m. Sunday February 19, 2006 in US/Pacific converts to 01:00:00 p.m. Sunday February 19, 2006 in US/Eastern PST is pacific right? I'm trying to figure out the Eastren Time Zone (US) Hopefully I'll be around I think I can though I did have a gith with my dad today :( On 2/16/06, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > will be here. > > - Beno?t > > On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 17:42 -0500, Jason Chu wrote: > > This message is just to remind everyone of the ports meeting in > > #archlinux64 at 10:00 AM PST on Feb, 19th. > > > > Hope to see you there, > > Jason > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch-ports mailing list > > arch-ports at archlinux.org > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com From jason at archlinux.org Mon Feb 20 03:15:26 2006 From: jason at archlinux.org (Jason Chu) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 03:15:26 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Meeting minutes Message-ID: <20060220081526.GB10163@mercury.xentac.net> I've written up the minutes from our meeting. Check them out in the wiki: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch-ports_minutes Jason -- If you understand, things are just as they are. If you do not understand, things are just as they are. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From a.radke at arcor.de Mon Feb 20 11:17:31 2006 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:17:31 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] arch64 testing iso - we need your help In-Reply-To: <20060220081526.GB10163@mercury.xentac.net> References: <20060220081526.GB10163@mercury.xentac.net> Message-ID: <43F9EB9B.6000608@arcor.de> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=18975 The iso boots but suddenly looses connection to tty. Should be kernel/initrd related. Any suggestion are welcome. AndyRTR From a.radke at arcor.de Sat Feb 25 05:52:49 2006 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:52:49 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Arch64 - call for a website maintainer Message-ID: <44003701.1020504@arcor.de> Our www.arch64.org website needs a whole rewrite. It should be fit into the www.archlinux.org (32bit) and www.archlinuxppc.org outfit. More features we want too. I've asked our server admin c14n and he told me that we can use almost every program we want for the website. So Joomla, mysql and much more shouldn't be a problem. So feel free to introduce yourself if you're interested. A running Arch64 system is not an absolute must. AndyRTR From syamajala at gamebox.net Sat Feb 25 09:31:56 2006 From: syamajala at gamebox.net (seshu yamajala) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:31:56 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Arch64 - call for a website maintainer In-Reply-To: <44003701.1020504@arcor.de> References: <44003701.1020504@arcor.de> Message-ID: <5CADE27E-52E8-4720-AE3E-19B9A632CC76@gamebox.net> On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Our www.arch64.org website needs a whole rewrite. It should be fit > into > the www.archlinux.org (32bit) and www.archlinuxppc.org outfit. More > features we want too. well, since we're gonna use the official servers soon, why not just use their site? the web gui for packages could be changed a little to show archs. too. - syamajala From msg431 at gmail.com Sat Feb 25 09:58:59 2006 From: msg431 at gmail.com (Matthew G) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:58:59 -0500 Subject: [arch-ports] Arch64 - call for a website maintainer In-Reply-To: <5CADE27E-52E8-4720-AE3E-19B9A632CC76@gamebox.net> References: <44003701.1020504@arcor.de> <5CADE27E-52E8-4720-AE3E-19B9A632CC76@gamebox.net> Message-ID: <7ce67b220602250658j192b7feekf6faf5f8dac4d5f6@mail.gmail.com> I Agree with syamajala, it would save a lot of work and not make people as confused though if we do this I think we'd need to put a big heading letting people know this isn't offical. On 2/25/06, seshu yamajala wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > > > Our www.arch64.org website needs a whole rewrite. It should be fit > > into > > the www.archlinux.org (32bit) and www.archlinuxppc.org outfit. More > > features we want too. > > well, since we're gonna use the official servers soon, why not just > use their site? the web gui for packages could be changed a little to > show archs. too. > > - syamajala > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431 at gmail.com From a.radke at arcor.de Sun Feb 26 17:13:53 2006 From: a.radke at arcor.de (Andreas Radke) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:13:53 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Arch64 - call for a website maintainer In-Reply-To: <5CADE27E-52E8-4720-AE3E-19B9A632CC76@gamebox.net> References: <44003701.1020504@arcor.de> <5CADE27E-52E8-4720-AE3E-19B9A632CC76@gamebox.net> Message-ID: <44022821.8090509@arcor.de> seshu yamajala schrieb: > On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > > >> Our www.arch64.org website needs a whole rewrite. It should be fit >> into >> the www.archlinux.org (32bit) and www.archlinuxppc.org outfit. More >> features we want too. >> > > well, since we're gonna use the official servers soon, why not just > use their site? the web gui for packages could be changed a little to > show archs. too. > > - syamajala > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > We don't know what "soon" is. And for now I need a place to put public informations. Wiki, forum and irc are all no good place for that. The archlinux website is quiet good if you are looking for informations but I like the one from ppc port a bit more. archlinux website looks a bit old-fashioned. I guess with a new server the archlinux website will have a rewrite too. For now we should soon have a simple but often updated website. Later we can discuss about best design. AndyRTR From arnaud.fortier at free.fr Mon Feb 27 04:10:13 2006 From: arnaud.fortier at free.fr (Arnaud Fortier) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:10:13 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Arch64 - call for a website maintainer In-Reply-To: <44022821.8090509@arcor.de> References: <44003701.1020504@arcor.de> <5CADE27E-52E8-4720-AE3E-19B9A632CC76@gamebox.net> <44022821.8090509@arcor.de> Message-ID: <4402C1F5.7050808@free.fr> Just an advise, for forum and wiki try to use the same as archelinux ones otherwise you'll have some trouble when merging site. Regards Arnaud Fortier Andreas Radke a ?crit : > seshu yamajala schrieb: > >> On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: >> >> >> >>> Our www.arch64.org website needs a whole rewrite. It should be fit >>> into >>> the www.archlinux.org (32bit) and www.archlinuxppc.org outfit. More >>> features we want too. >>> >>> >> well, since we're gonna use the official servers soon, why not just >> use their site? the web gui for packages could be changed a little to >> show archs. too. >> >> - syamajala >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> arch-ports mailing list >> arch-ports at archlinux.org >> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports >> >> >> > We don't know what "soon" is. And for now I need a place to put public > informations. Wiki, forum and irc are all no good place for that. > The archlinux website is quiet good if you are looking for informations > but I like the one from ppc port a bit more. archlinux website looks a > bit old-fashioned. > > I guess with a new server the archlinux website will have a rewrite too. > > For now we should soon have a simple but often updated website. > > Later we can discuss about best design. > > AndyRTR > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > > From mrfubar at gmail.com Mon Feb 27 09:40:12 2006 From: mrfubar at gmail.com (Mr FUBAR) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:40:12 +0100 Subject: [arch-ports] Arch64 - call for a website maintainer In-Reply-To: <4402C1F5.7050808@free.fr> References: <44003701.1020504@arcor.de> <5CADE27E-52E8-4720-AE3E-19B9A632CC76@gamebox.net> <44022821.8090509@arcor.de> <4402C1F5.7050808@free.fr> Message-ID: <12983d900602270640p7520b633q1f2aa58c990f949e@mail.gmail.com> Port specific information (install guides, hardware requirements) could be on a completely different site. But wouldn't it be nicer to have package information on the regular Archlinux.org? Just like Gentoo (and probably many other distributions) has? On 2/27/06, Arnaud Fortier wrote: > Just an advise, for forum and wiki try to use the same as archelinux > ones otherwise you'll have some trouble when merging site. > > Regards > > Arnaud Fortier > > Andreas Radke a ?crit : > > seshu yamajala schrieb: > > > >> On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Our www.arch64.org website needs a whole rewrite. It should be fit > >>> into > >>> the www.archlinux.org (32bit) and www.archlinuxppc.org outfit. More > >>> features we want too. > >>> > >>> > >> well, since we're gonna use the official servers soon, why not just > >> use their site? the web gui for packages could be changed a little to > >> show archs. too. > >> > >> - syamajala > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> arch-ports mailing list > >> arch-ports at archlinux.org > >> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > >> > >> > >> > > We don't know what "soon" is. And for now I need a place to put public > > informations. Wiki, forum and irc are all no good place for that. > > The archlinux website is quiet good if you are looking for informations > > but I like the one from ppc port a bit more. archlinux website looks a > > bit old-fashioned. > > > > I guess with a new server the archlinux website will have a rewrite too. > > > > For now we should soon have a simple but often updated website. > > > > Later we can discuss about best design. > > > > AndyRTR > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch-ports mailing list > > arch-ports at archlinux.org > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > arch-ports at archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports >