[arch-ports] PKGBUILD and package release thoughts
terakuma at imbris.net
Fri Mar 10 18:31:39 EST 2006
>Do we really need more variables? Why not leave only one pkgrel number
>e.g. foo 1.0-1.
>If the x86_64 bit package needs a fix we would build only a 1.0-2 on
>let out not affected architectures. Next common release would be 1.0-3 for
>Is it possible that way?
In the interest of keeping a single common PKGBUILD it sounds like Jason's
solution would be the best, since it lets gensync/updatesync detect and
pull the needed updates automatically.
(If I understand correctly.)
I don't even use ABS so I should probably shut-up, but since you asked . .
. . . :)
More information about the arch-ports