[arch-ports] PKGBUILD and package release thoughts

[Jason Chu]

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:13:59AM +0530, ganja.guru wrote:
> I think Xentac's suggestion is simple enough..but do we really need to 
> have the original "pkgrel" variable when we have the new pkgrel_i686 and 
> pkgrel_amd64? What purpose does the original "pkgrel" variable serve 
> when the final package release number does not depend on it?
> 
> ganja_guru

If an arch isn't listed, it'll use the pkgrel.  Only if a change doesn't
affect something does it get its own pkgrel variable.

It also helps to have a global pkgrel that everything stays in sync with.

Jason

-- 
If you understand, things are just as they are.  If you do not understand,
things are just as they are.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-ports/attachments/20060311/a4a72b82/attachment.pgp>