[arch-ports] [PPC] Urgent Need to Update Pacman

[Matthew William Cox]

On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:24:34PM +0200, Armin Luntzer wrote:
> That's ok, our 3.0.5-1 is actually i686 3.0.5-2. The reason is that our
> update of pacman had been delayed a bit and the fix is already
> incorporated, but of course you couldn't have known this.

Hmm, would have been helpful all around if the pacman devs had bumped
the version to indicate a bugfix. I'm not asking for 3.0.6, but would
3.0.5.1 have been too much trouble? ;)

Matt