[arch-projects] [PATCH] [mkinitcpio] Add missing groups=('base') in PKGBUILD

Eric Bélanger snowmaniscool at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 12:49:47 EDT 2011


On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
<vmlinuz386 at yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 11:32 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
>> <vmlinuz386 at yahoo.com.ar>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi<vmlinuz386 at yahoo.com.ar>
>>> ---
>>>  PKGBUILD |    1 +
>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
>>> index 2cb6a6d..3352378 100644
>>> --- a/PKGBUILD
>>> +++ b/PKGBUILD
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ pkgdesc="Modular initramfs image creation utility"
>>>  arch=(any)
>>>  url="http://www.archlinux.org/"
>>>  license=('GPL')
>>> +groups=('base')
>>>  conflicts=('mkinitcpio')
>>>  provides=("mkinitcpio=$pkgver")
>>>  depends=('mkinitcpio-busybox>=1.16.1-2' 'module-init-tools'
>>> 'util-linux>=2.19' 'libarchive' 'coreutils'
>>> --
>>> 1.7.6.1
>>>
>>>
>> mkinitcpio is a depends for linux which is in base. We don't put
>> dependencies of base packages in base group unless they really belong
>> in base.
>>
> I know that rule. Anyway, mkinitcpio is already in {base}, and without
> putting this in this _devel_ PKGBUILD, makes things a bit complex when using
> "pacman -Sy base --root /some/path" with a [customrepo]
>

I didn't realized that this was for the devel PKGBUILD so you can
ignore my remark. I don't really have an opinion or care  on whether
is should be added or not.

> --
> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
> \cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha = 1
>
>


More information about the arch-projects mailing list