[arch-projects] [PATCH] [abs] Remove VCS PKGBUILD prototypes

[Jason St. John]

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Daniel Wallace
<danielwallace at gtmanfred.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> "Jason St. John" <jstjohn at purdue.edu> wrote:
>
>>From: "Jason St. John" <jstjohn at purdue.edu>
>>
>>pacman 4.1 greatly simplied the use of VCS PKGBUILDs. Usage of VCS
>>PKGBUILDs is documented in PKGBUILD(5) and on the ArchWiki. Including a
>>separate prototype for each VCS is unnecessary, and they should be
>>removed.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Jason St. John <jstjohn at purdue.edu>
>>---
>>prototypes/PKGBUILD-bzr.proto   | 64
>>---------------------------------------
>>prototypes/PKGBUILD-cvs.proto   | 65
>>----------------------------------------
>>prototypes/PKGBUILD-darcs.proto | 66
>>-----------------------------------------
>>prototypes/PKGBUILD-git.proto   | 64
>>---------------------------------------
>>prototypes/PKGBUILD-hg.proto    | 65
>>----------------------------------------
>>prototypes/PKGBUILD-svn.proto   | 63
>>---------------------------------------
>> 6 files changed, 387 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-bzr.proto
>> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-cvs.proto
>> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-darcs.proto
>> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-git.proto
>> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-hg.proto
>> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-svn.proto
>>
>
> If I remember correctly, cvs and darcs are not supported in pacman yet.  I know at least darcs isn't.  So they shouldn't be removed.
> - --
> Sent from my Android Phone.
> Daniel Wallace
> Arch Linux Trusted User
> GTManfred
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: APG v1.0.8
>
> iQFUBAEBCAA+BQJRYhqXNxxEYW5pZWwgV2FsbGFjZSAoZ3RtYW5mcmVkKSA8ZGFu
> aWVsLndhbGxhY2VAZ2F0ZWNoLmVkdT4ACgkQX6XlVE8BDUgPZggAnHcAnrN6vrQf
> dlSMpZBZeoR7B2yGtsQkermLuBrBXknsHFc8eKd/yoJ6T7DSOnaMZ0nWT2ddFPeo
> XOVU3b3ElyQUb7cx97MkTOkp/Lj9hjTU6oKYPwn/m+/KDTmosR+IXlC61Bri6dYW
> lUD9A4lAGtUL/nC1u9MqCcpHpKqIm0SF/laoXAZH7o1Iwlr2ibzZbNwOYTdr5UN+
> 74pN2/eZ9e4Sink1x4Z4bxnxL4SREimkOnf3P7DZ4fz8+HeLClz/XWR1OoFZ2kln
> d+7w359QITzyws3Nxs6O1eabdB8LLhFW7ZLTAMKueBjGP2PQ//te968A0idT4mSz
> BgiOSm/xpQ==
> =npC0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Yes, you are correct. I just checked PKGBUILD(5). I have resubmitted
this patch here:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2013-April/003723.html

Thanks for catching this!
Jason