[arch-projects] [arch-ports] [devtools] Rebasing devtools32 to contribute upstream

Erich Eckner arch at eckner.net
Tue Jan 16 07:51:29 UTC 2018

Hi Luke,

yeah, sure, we/I can switch to a rebasing workflow. Thanks for the
suggestion. In retrospect, I have no Idea anymore, why I started with a
merging workflow :-/


On 15.01.2018 18:24, Luke Shumaker wrote:
> Hi all,
> As the maintainer of Parabola's devtools, I know that with a merging
> workflow, it can be a huge pain to rebase out changes to have patchset
> that you can contribute upstream.
> If any of the Arch Linux 32 team ever decide that you want to
> contribute changes from devtools32 into upstream devtools, I expect
> that you will find the "lukeshu/rebase/archlinux32" branch of
> https://git.parabola.nu/packages/devtools-par.git/ to be useful.  It
> is simply devtools32's "master" branch, rebased so that it looks like
> it used a rebasing workflow instead of a merging workflow.
> I'll generally keep it up-to-date as I keep an eye out for anything
> that I might want to backport into Parabola.  (And indeed, there's
> already one such change
> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2018-January/004704.html )

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/attachments/20180116/6f074f48/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the arch-projects mailing list