[arch-releng] [PATCH] Fix typos, formatting, and vague language where possible.

Dan McGee dpmcgee at gmail.com
Mon Jan 26 21:22:46 EST 2009

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 21:20, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter at plaetinck.be> wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:57:40 +0200
>> Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 19:50, Pierre Schmitz <pierre at archlinux.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Am Montag 26 Januar 2009 18:28:29 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>>> >> I'm fairly certain we agreed, internally, to use ArchLinux wherever
>>> >> possible. Adding Thayer for confirmation here.
>>> >
>>> > And I am quite sure we use "Arch Linux" everywhere. Just have a
>>> > look at our homepage, wikipedia article or distrowatch. So just to
>>> > be consistent we should keep "Arch Linux".
>>> during one of these Arch Linux vs ArchLinux discussions someone posted
>>> a link to one of the first Judd's announcements, but I cannot find it
>>> now.
>>> plus most distros have Linux as a separate word, e.g. Debian
>>> GNU/Linux, Red Hat Linux (at least it was so before that
>>> Enterprise/Fedora split) etc.
>>> sorry for bikeshedding offtopic. :-)
>> I also think Arch Linux is notably cooler then ArchLinux.
>> But Judd is *the man*, if he wanted it ArchLinux then so be it.. maybe
>> someone can ask him? :-)
> no, actually it was with space
> that's just the logo text that had arch and linux concatenated and lowerspace
> P.S.: either I suck at writing search queries in gmail, or gmail's
> search suck, I cannot find link to that email.

Why look at email when you can look at the old website?


Note the title and the usages in the text.


More information about the arch-releng mailing list