[arch-releng] [PATCH] Fix typos, formatting, and vague language where possible.

[Dan McGee]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 21:20, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter at plaetinck.be> wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:57:40 +0200
>> Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 19:50, Pierre Schmitz <pierre at archlinux.de>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Am Montag 26 Januar 2009 18:28:29 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>>> >> I'm fairly certain we agreed, internally, to use ArchLinux wherever
>>> >> possible. Adding Thayer for confirmation here.
>>> >
>>> > And I am quite sure we use "Arch Linux" everywhere. Just have a
>>> > look at our homepage, wikipedia article or distrowatch. So just to
>>> > be consistent we should keep "Arch Linux".
>>>
>>> during one of these Arch Linux vs ArchLinux discussions someone posted
>>> a link to one of the first Judd's announcements, but I cannot find it
>>> now.
>>> plus most distros have Linux as a separate word, e.g. Debian
>>> GNU/Linux, Red Hat Linux (at least it was so before that
>>> Enterprise/Fedora split) etc.
>>> sorry for bikeshedding offtopic. :-)
>>>
>>
>> I also think Arch Linux is notably cooler then ArchLinux.
>> But Judd is *the man*, if he wanted it ArchLinux then so be it.. maybe
>> someone can ask him? :-)
>
> no, actually it was with space
> that's just the logo text that had arch and linux concatenated and lowerspace
>
> P.S.: either I suck at writing search queries in gmail, or gmail's
> search suck, I cannot find link to that email.

Why look at email when you can look at the old website?

http://web.archive.org/web/20020328043401/http://www.archlinux.org/

Note the title and the usages in the text.

-Dan