[arch-releng] 2010.04.05 snapshots ready for testing

[Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi]

On 04/06/2010 08:22 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:14:14 +0200
> Dieter Plaetinck<dieter at plaetinck.be>  wrote:
>
>    
>> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:12:02 +0200
>> Sven-Hendrik Haase<sh at lutzhaase.com>  wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> Wait, weren't these going to be dual-arch images?
>>>        
>> i will do dual-arch images yes. haven't had time yet. This shouldn't
>> hold anyone back from testing the normal images though.
>>
>> Dieter
>>      
> okay guys,
> I ran Gerardo's archiso2dual script and wow. it seems to work nicely.
> Note that I have not tested the resulting dual arch images at all [yet].
> I count on the community.
>
> @ Aaron: total size of all images is 1.8GB, nicely (way) below the 2.5GB
> treshold we had set for "serve them all or not".
>
> You can find the added dual images and updated Changelog @
> http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
>
> I used the "full" profile, so these things are stripped:
> ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/boot
> ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/include
> ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/src
> ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/share
> ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/lib/modules
>
> not sure if this is a good thing, if space permits I want to keep the
> docs, and the /usr/include and /usr/src seems also useful for those
> cases where you need to compile something.
>
> Dieter.
>
>    
You can just use -T split_lm that does not remove any file, it just 
split /usr/share and /lib/modules. Images sizes are aceptable (if I 
remember good, core-dual still under 650MB).



-- 
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219  76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D