[aur-dev] [PATCH] Umark out-of-date on update

BaSh bash.lnx at gmail.com
Sun May 4 14:26:04 EDT 2008


2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo at gmail.com>:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:05 AM, BaSh <bash.lnx at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Hi Callan,
>  >  I think this patch isn't necessary: Packages->OutOfDate is default 0
>  >  in the database.
>  >
>  >  Regards,
>  >  Andrea
>  >
>  >  2008/5/4 Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo at gmail.com>:
>  >
>  >
>  > > Unmarks packages out of date on update, I can't think of a case where
>  >  >  this isn't a good idea and a lot of people complain about it
>  >  >  (stonecrest).
>  >  >
>  >  >  --
>  >  >  Callan Barrett
>  >  >
>
>  This is for when a pkgbuild is updated, not initially submitted. At
>  the moment the default behavior is to leave a package as Out-of-date
>  when a new package is uploaded to update an old one. If this is what
>  you meant I don't really follow why the patch isn't necessary.
Ops...excuse me, i didn't look it is for when a pkgbuild is updated :)

Andrea

-- 
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux User: #430842




More information about the aur-dev mailing list