[aur-dev] [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Virtual path feature
archlinux at cryptocrack.de
Wed Jul 18 16:39:49 EDT 2012
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:29:10PM -0400, canyonknight at gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Lukas Fleischer
> <archlinux at cryptocrack.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:37:32PM -0400, canyonknight at gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Lukas Fleischer
> >> <archlinux at cryptocrack.de> wrote:
> >> > This implements nicer looking URLs, such as "/packages/" instead of
> >> > "/packages.php", "/packages/$pkgname/" instead of "/packages.php?ID=$id"
> >> > etc.
> >> >
> >> > Note that these patches are not ready to be merged yet but I'd like to
> >> > get some comments. We'd probably also have to add rewrite rules to our
> >> > AUR setup on sigurd or add legacy rules to the routing back end to
> >> > ensure old URLs still work.
> >> >
> >> I didn't realize you were already merging these. Setting
> >> $USE_VIRTUAL_URLS = false seems broken on my test setup. I'm getting a
> >> call to an undefined function error on any page besides index.php. I'm
> >> guessing that the include_once("routing.inc.php") should really be in
> >> aur.inc.php not in index.php?
> > Yeah, you're probably right. The include() should be moved.
> >> It also seems that all CSS doesn't load properly. I'm guessing this is
> >> related to the change to absolute URI paths for stylesheets?
> > Works for me... Did you clear the browser cache? Does it work if you
> > enable "$USE_VIRTUAL_URLS"?
> Clearing cache doesn't work. Enabling/disabling $USE_VIRTUAL_URLS
> makes no difference. I think I know what the problem is though. Commit
> a03c684ecd51327f9c6921a6e0001d82e3223799 describes using absolute URI
> paths for CSS and images. They are actually root-relative with that
> commit, not absolute. So someone like me with a strange http root
> doesn't get the CSS loaded properly.
> It could be fixed by putting $AUR_LOCATION before any CSS or image
> paths (thus using truly absolute paths). Another solution was also
> previously suggested by Ike in regards to portability:
Yes, I will submit a patch that implements that -- didn't know you were
using a root != "/".
> >> Sorry I don't have much time to fully review these but this is what
> >> I've seen so far.
> > Don't worry -- I discovered a lot of other minor regressions that were
> > probably introduced when merging all the archweb and virtual path
> > stuff... Lots of bug fixes to follow.
More information about the aur-dev