[aur-dev] AUR 2.1.0 released
girard.cedric at gmail.com
Wed Jul 10 11:41:40 EDT 2013
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> > The restriction on the available fields also seemed a little
> > puzzling to me - but I suppose package maintainers are free to
> > include whatever fields they like (as long as they follow the
> > general file format).
> Which ones are missing? I don't think that the AUR uses any other
What about the "source" field?
More information about the aur-dev