[aur-dev] AUR 2.1.0 released

[Cédric Girard]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:

> > The restriction on the available fields also seemed a little
> > puzzling to me - but I suppose package maintainers are free to
> > include whatever fields they like (as long as they follow the
> > general file format).
>
> Which ones are missing? I don't think that the AUR uses any other
> fields.
>


What about the "source" field?

-- 
Cédric Girard