[aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Versioned Provisions

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Thu Jan 17 19:19:59 EST 2008

On Jan 17, 2008 5:50 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> forget the quotes on their provision (even Aaron did it above!). If we

Hah, but I know bash parsing rules!

> What this does *NOT* mean is that versioned provisions will ever be
> supported. This is the reason we did not go with the = sign
> originally- it might lead packagers to believe they were supported.
> Versioned provisions really don't make sense- if someone can provide a
> use case, I can probably debunk it.

Um, I think you misspoke a little here. I assume you meant to add
something other than "versioned provisions will ever be supported".
I'd guess, based on context, you meant to indicate the ">=" and "<="
stuff, right?

More information about the aur-general mailing list