[aur-general] List of comminity64 failures?

[Eric Belanger]

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Allan McRae wrote:

> Allan McRae wrote:
>> Is there a list of packages that can not be put in community64 due to build 
>> failures/binary package etc?  I had a look through the wiki and found 
>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_ToDoS which has no community 
>> info.  Looking at the pkg diff page 
>> (http://dev.archlinux.org/~andyrtr/pkg_diff.html) there are ~60 packages in 
>> i686 community but not in x86_64 community.  There is only 1 in x86_64 but 
>> not in i686 which is not a lib32 package.  I'm going to spend some time 
>> shortening this list but I'm sure some of these are legitimately only i686.
>> 
>> As an aside, something is wrong with the matching in the pkg_diff page. 
>> Some packages appear twice in the list, once with a missing i686 version 
>> and once with a missing x86_64 version.  I think this is when the is a 
>> major version difference between the platforms. e.g. gambas2 & yaz.
>
> Replying to my own post...  I found this: 
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community64_Status.  It was old and 
> unused so I have changed it to have the current package differences there. 
> Can people add reasons for these packages not be in x86_64 (if there is one). 
> It will save me from having to look at every package individually.
>
> Cheers,
> Allan
>
>

I'm aware of several (if not most) of these build issues. I'll add to the 
list tonight. You might want to wait for my input before going through 
each individual packages.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.