[aur-general] List of comminity64 failures?

Eric Belanger belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA
Mon Mar 17 10:43:20 EDT 2008

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Allan McRae wrote:

> Allan McRae wrote:
>> Is there a list of packages that can not be put in community64 due to build 
>> failures/binary package etc?  I had a look through the wiki and found 
>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_ToDoS which has no community 
>> info.  Looking at the pkg diff page 
>> (http://dev.archlinux.org/~andyrtr/pkg_diff.html) there are ~60 packages in 
>> i686 community but not in x86_64 community.  There is only 1 in x86_64 but 
>> not in i686 which is not a lib32 package.  I'm going to spend some time 
>> shortening this list but I'm sure some of these are legitimately only i686.
>> As an aside, something is wrong with the matching in the pkg_diff page. 
>> Some packages appear twice in the list, once with a missing i686 version 
>> and once with a missing x86_64 version.  I think this is when the is a 
>> major version difference between the platforms. e.g. gambas2 & yaz.
> Replying to my own post...  I found this: 
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community64_Status.  It was old and 
> unused so I have changed it to have the current package differences there. 
> Can people add reasons for these packages not be in x86_64 (if there is one). 
> It will save me from having to look at every package individually.
> Cheers,
> Allan

I'm aware of several (if not most) of these build issues. I'll add to the 
list tonight. You might want to wait for my input before going through 
each individual packages.

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

More information about the aur-general mailing list