[aur-general] List of comminity64 failures?
t-r-a-y at mbnet.fi
Tue Mar 18 04:34:58 EDT 2008
Allan McRae wrote:
> Is there a list of packages that can not be put in community64 due to
> build failures/binary package etc? I had a look through the wiki and
> found http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_ToDoS which has no
> community info. Looking at the pkg diff page
> (http://dev.archlinux.org/~andyrtr/pkg_diff.html) there are ~60
> packages in i686 community but not in x86_64 community. There is only
> 1 in x86_64 but not in i686 which is not a lib32 package. I'm going
> to spend some time shortening this list but I'm sure some of these are
> legitimately only i686.
> As an aside, something is wrong with the matching in the pkg_diff
> page. Some packages appear twice in the list, once with a missing i686
> version and once with a missing x86_64 version. I think this is when
> the is a major version difference between the platforms. e.g. gambas2
> & yaz.
Very old list from times when there was no official community on x86_64
Still kinda inactive as final exams are going on. Last one will be next
week. After that I rest a little and the next week will be a trip to
London (free transportation for me so not going to pass).
Also cant find a way to set myself inactive in AUR webpages.
More information about the aur-general