[aur-general] Keeping community64 up to date
mcrae_allan at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 27 19:38:16 EDT 2008
> Simply, at this point, with Aaron's building machine and some of us
> which have 32/64 bit hardware, I don't understand why there are ~ 150
> different packages from 32 to 64 bit community.
I think the best we can hope for here is ~130 differences, with lib32
packages and i686 binary blobs. The difference list was at >300 three
> sergej: Most of these packages are yours. Remember the discussion that
> we had some months ago? You wrote that you're capable to maintain a
> large number of packages: and I know your skill, and I'm sure that you
> can do this: but please, try to sync 32 and 64 community.
I second that... I build ~150 packages in the last two days and at
least 120 of the were Sergej's. This is a bit extreme due to all his
perl packages but I think the point remains.
> Last last: What about dtw? We have a lot of his packages in community
> out-of-dated , in this page  seems he isn't a TU, but has 3 bug
> opened . IMHO, the best is moving all his packages back to
> unsupported and close bug assigned to him.
I can remember him posting about inactivity just after becoming a dev
and have only seem evidence of his presence intermittently after that.
I updated his geany package the other day.
Can I just add, do we have a x86_64 TU who uses KDE. There are several
KDE packages waiting to be built but I am running out of bandwidth for
the month and don't want to download all the dependancies. Same goes
More information about the aur-general