[aur-general] Where to put your name when you adopt an AUR package (was: TU Application)

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Thu Oct 9 13:11:30 EDT 2008

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Regardless of what it once was, I think the current method is silly
>> and needlessly confusing. Contributor should be there to credit the
>> previous handlers for a package. Maintainer should just be the person
>> who is currently in charge of keeping it working, whether binary or
>> otherwise. Pacman's "Packager" data is kept for the binary files,
>> making the current use of Maintainer redundant.
>> I think it should be changed to the more logical way. Anyone else have
>> an opinion on that?
> +1


More information about the aur-general mailing list