[aur-general] Stopping Arch contribuiting

Ronald van Haren pressh at gmail.com
Tue Sep 16 14:58:24 EDT 2008


On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:26 PM,  <w9ya at qrparci.net> wrote:
> I just grabbed gputils and gpsim as I use to do these MANY years ago for
> arch.
>
> Thanks for the heads up and Very best regards;
>
> Bob Finch
>
>
>> Well, now that Ronald and I mention it, let help DaNiMoTh with this.
>>
>> This is the list of packages that actually DaNiMoTh maintain:
>>
>> boinc 5.10.45-6
>> ccsm 0.7.6-1
>> compiz-bcop 0.7.6-1
>> compiz-core 0.7.6-1
>> compiz-decorator-gtk 0.7.6-1
>> compiz-decorator-kde 0.7.6-2
>> compiz-fusion-plugins-extra 0.7.6-1
>> compiz-fusion-plugins-main 0.7.6-1
>> compiz-manager 0.6.0-2
>> compizconfig-backend-gconf 0.7.6-1
>> compizconfig-backend-kconfig 0.7.6-2
>> compizconfig-python 0.7.6-1
>> dumb 0.9.3-1
>> dvd-slideshow 0.8.0-4
>> emerald 0.7.6-1
>> emerald-themes 0.6.0-2
>> fusion-icon 20080313-1
>> gambas 1.0.19-1
>> glitz 0.5.6-1
>> gobby 0.4.5-1
>> gpsim 0.22.0-1
>> gputils 0.13.5-1
>> gtk-recordmydesktop 0.3.7-1
>> gtk2+extra 2.1.1-1
>> kdvdauthorwizard 1.4.6-4
>> ktechlab 0.3.6-1
>> libcompizconfig 0.7.6-1
>> mandvd 2.5-1
>> mesa-xgl-git 20070228-1
>> mozplugger 1.10.2-1
>> net6 1.3.5-1
>> obby 0.4.4-1
>> openoffice-spell-no 2.0.9-1
>> oregano 0.69.0-1
>> pygoocanvas 0.9.0-1
>> qmc2 0.2.b3-1
>> qt-recordmydesktop 0.3.7-1
>> rsnapshot 1.3.0-1
>> sarg 2.2.3.1-1
>> scilab 4.1.2-4
>> sdlmame 0.126-1
>> wqy-bitmapfont 0.9.9-4
>> wqy-zenhei 0.6.26-1
>> xgl 0.0.1.20080407-1
>>
>> I adopted gobby and obby
>>
>> Let's start the adoption process then.. less work to DaNi ;)
>>
>> P.S: Orphan packages should move to unsupported, so how long should be
>> the time lapsus to do this? 1 month (imho) or more?, ideas?.
>>
>> A.
>>
>> --
>> Angel Velásquez
>> angvp @ irc.freenode.net
>> Linux Counter: #359909
>> Arch Linux Trusted User
>
>e
>
>
I took all compiz related packages (maybe I missed one or two I've not
checked it yet, will do so soon). But if someone else wants to
maintain them please take them from me again, I'm happy if someone
else will take them (or anyone of the upcoming TUs if they pass the
voting process). I'd rather not increase my workload on community too
much as I would like to devote more time to the dev part of arch.

Ronald



More information about the aur-general mailing list