[aur-general] Plans for packages in community
daenyth+arch at gmail.com
Wed Sep 24 17:13:01 EDT 2008
> On BBS there was a discussion about having the documentation of the
> TeXlive packages available in some repo.
I don't really have an opinion on this.
> What are the plans about having a repo for architecture independent
I don't know of any such plans. Pretty sure there are none. I like the
idea though, it makes sense.
> Aonther question: there is a package named sage-mathematics in the AUR.
> It has been orphaned, so I updated it.
> Should this go to community?
I don't have much of an informed opinion, but my gut says it would be
a bad idea. I seem to recall that the arch servers don't have a ton of
disk space, and that would be a rather large bandwidth drain in
addition. I'm against this one at least.
More information about the aur-general