[aur-general] Maintainer vs Contributor tag let's find a solution ; )
angvp at archlinux.com.ve
Sun Apr 5 21:23:40 EDT 2009
> 5. Change the previous maintainer tag to a contributor tag and add
> yourself as maintainer
> I don't quite follow... you say that you want to improve the method,
> but you insist that we don't change it and use the old one? Please
> correct me if I'm wrong
This should be 4.- and it's more like than my 2nd point .. then that
point about Maintainer is just because exist a binary package in
official repos and it's maintained by will be lost, so the concept
will change to Maintainer is the people who actually owns the PKGBUILD
in any repo or AUR.. (just to clarify how to use the tags).
>> Please try to don't flame the ideas, try to propose new ones, or
>> improve the exposed by me.
> Uh.. what? Disregarding this...
Don't know, sometimes I just generate flames, maybe is my bad english :D.
So resuming: there is a new point on the list! by Daenyth, who will
decide will be the valid point is the question that I have right now.
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Linux Counter: #359909
More information about the aur-general