[aur-general] Maintainer vs Contributor tag let's find a solution ; )
daenyth+arch at gmail.com
Sun Apr 5 21:37:35 EDT 2009
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 21:39, Xyne <xyne at archlinux.ca> wrote:
> I think it makes the most sense to designate the person currently maintaining the package/PKGBUILD as the maintainer irrespective of that person's status in the community or the destination of the package/PKGBUILD. It immediately indicates to anyone looking at the PKGBUILD whom they should contact about updating it.
> I think previous maintainers should be listed as contributors along with anyone who's contributed signficant changes to the package.
> Telling people that they can't claim to be a "maintainer" of a package because they're not a dev or TU comes across the wrong way too. Just because the binary isn't hosted in the AUR doesn't mean that the work of maintaining a package (updating, responding to comments, etc) is any different than if the binary were uploaded.
> Just my 2¢.
+1 on all counts
More information about the aur-general