[aur-general] Adoptable AUR packages
garoth at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 13:24:38 EDT 2009
The other problem is that a list of orphaned packages on the wiki
would be subject to the same kind of problem: someone puts something
there, then a year passes and the package isn't needed anymore but
doesn't get removed because there are 8000 packages on that list. I
think this wouldn't really solve much in the long term.
+1 to Mr. Haren.
-Andrei "Garoth" Thorp
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/6/09, Ashok Gautham <scriptdevil.arch at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Imanol Celaya <
>> ornitorrincos at archlinux-es.org> wrote:
>>> doesn't the orphan search function in AUR do the same and automated?
>> That is exactly my point. Orphan search gives you even packages that have
>> orphaned because the packages are not needed any more. In fact such packages
>> are the majority.
>> Ashok `ScriptDevil` Gautham
> Instead of inventing a new way of sorting orphan packages it would be
> best to put the/'a lot of' effort in cleaning up the current list.
> Packages that should not be there should be removed.
More information about the aur-general