[aur-general] Package removal

Daenyth Blank daenyth+arch at gmail.com
Thu Apr 16 10:15:44 EDT 2009

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:42, Vinzenz Vietzke <vinz at archlinux.us> wrote:
> hi all,
> since exfalso is included in quodlibet in [extra] and the AUR package is
> orphaned/outdated -  shouldn't this package be removed? or shall it
> remain for offering the chance to install _only_ exfalso?
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19030
> vinz

It should be left alone, and preferably updated. I tried a while back,
but their build system changed and I couldn't figure out a clean way
to install only ex falso. I'd love to see the package fixed though.

More information about the aur-general mailing list