[aur-general] Status of the Chromium/Chrome packages on AUR

Ionut Biru biru.ionut at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 16:00:04 EST 2009

On 12/08/2009 10:46 PM, Ranguvar wrote:
> Hash: SHA512
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 14:53, Ionut Biru<ibiru at archlinux.org>  wrote:
>> but it should follow only the beta as
>> google-chrome-dev should follow only dev
> I'm not sure if I'm getting your meaning right, but I think that if a
> new beta release arrives,
> and it is a version later than the current dev release, -dev should be
> updated... same for
> - -beta updating to the latest stable if there's not  a newer beta.
> Users shouldn't have to switch packages to get a newer release if they
> use -beta or -dev IMO :)
>    -- Ranguvar

i don't care how they update. i just don't want to see another n 
packages for the same thing just because the maintainer of -dev didn't 
updated in the second two after a new version was released.


More information about the aur-general mailing list