[aur-general] Community and the AUR (Was: Vote - Moving [community] to use same system as main repos)

[stefan-husmann at t-online.de]

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:59:10 +0100
> Subject: [aur-general] Community and the AUR (Was: Vote - Moving
> [community] to use same system as main repos)
> From: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org>
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
> <aur-general at archlinux.org>

> Loui Chang wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 03:36:56PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > 
> > > Loui Chang wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:51:40PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > As far as the web changes go, I suggest the relevant AUR
> > > > > developers talk to  the people who do the Arch site work and
> > > > > sort this out.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > Well it depends. Do we want [community] to remain in AUR so we
> > > > keep votes and comments and such, or do we drop those packages
> > > > from AUR? 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > One thing I think no-one has brought up regarding this.  The main
> > > repos don't have package categories.  So how would the AUR handle
> > > that? 
> > > 
> > 
> > I think the categories would be removed.
> > 
> 
> Any other people want to comment on this?  Any TUs feel keeping AUR
> pages for [community] packages is necessary?
> 
> Allan
> 
> 
Hello,

I do not get bugreports, but I get AUR comments for my packages. So
people seem to use them. I think they should be kept. Categories con be
removed IMHO.

Regards Stefan