[aur-general] dmraid 1.0.0-rc15

[Tobias Powalowski]

Am Donnerstag 02 Juli 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> Hi
> I have tested the testing package, and it does not work.
> Same problem as dmraid rc14 with jmicron : whitespaces in devices name (
> "jmicronRAID0            p1" )
> So back to my own package of dmraid rc15. As soon as I get back my install
> running - I still have to remake initram with my working dmraid ( yeah yeah
> I should not test here ... :) ) - I will send you my pkgbuild if you want.
>
> 2009/7/2 Antoine Noal <antoine.noal at gmail.com>
>
> > Hi
> > I have tested the testing package, and it does not work.
> > Same problem as dmraid rc14 with jmicron : whitespaces in devices name (
> > "jmicronRAID0            p1" )
> > So back to my own package of dmraid rc15. As soon as I get back my
> > install running - I still have to remake initram with my working dmraid (
> > yeah yeah I should not test here ... :) ) - I will send you my pkgbuild
> > if you want.
> >
> > 2009/6/21 Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de>
> >
> > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> >> > Additional p ? What do you mean ?
> >> >
> >> > 2009/6/4 Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de>
> >> >
> >> > > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> >> > > > Ok then so I can tell you that on arch64 with a jmicron chipset
> >> > > > it's working fine.
> >> > > > I'll send you all the needed info you want later, I'm not on my
> >> > > > box
> >>
> >> now
> >>
> >> > > but
> >> > >
> >> > > > I haven't applied any extra patchs.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 2009/6/4 Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb Hvannentir:
> >> > > > > > Hi
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I flagged out of date dmraid quite some time ago because I had
> >>
> >> to
> >>
> >> > > build
> >> > >
> >> > > > > my
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > own package for dmraid rc15.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Indeed, in order to make my software raid work with a Jmicron
> >> > >
> >> > > chipset,
> >> > >
> >> > > > > > an important fix was necessary.
> >> > > > > > ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219058 )
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Why the package is still oudated ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I'm looknig for dmraid users, i can't test it, last time i
> >> > > > > bumped
> >>
> >> it
> >>
> >> > > > > to .15 and a lot of dmraid users had broken machines.
> >> > > > > We can do again a testrun if it works now better with some
> >> > > > > patches from redhat.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Tobias Powalowski
> >> > > > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> >> > > > > http://www.archlinux.org
> >> > > > > tpowa at archlinux.org
> >> > >
> >> > > Do you need the additional p too?
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Tobias Powalowski
> >> > > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> >> > > http://www.archlinux.org
> >> > > tpowa at archlinux.org
> >>
> >> The new dmarid package is in testing, please test and give feedback,
> >> thanks
> >> greetings
> >> tpowa
> >> --
> >> Tobias Powalowski
> >> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> >> http://www.archlinux.org
> >> tpowa at archlinux.org
What is the difference to my package?
It's the standard tarball with the most recent fedora patches.
greetings
tpowa

-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20090704/e7f57592/attachment.pgp>