[aur-general] Disowning monsoon, monotorrent and mono-nat

[Jaime Oyarzun Knittel]

Angel Velásquez wrote:
[...]
> 
> The first solution seems better to me (but both solutions can be
> implemented), why the first solution is better to me?, Well in the
> case when a guy with several packages decided to orphan all his
> packages the users who have an rss client pointing to the "orphan rss"
> will get flooded heh.. but it's the risk that they took in any case.
> 
> So +1 for the first solution

+1 too.

One implementation can be a daily mail with all the orphaned & adopted
packages to subscribers, to avoid tens of e-mails.

-- 
mitoyarzun
http://www.archlinux.cl/