[aur-general] introduction and questions

jezra jezra.lickter at gmail.com
Tue Jul 7 15:06:11 EDT 2009

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Thorsten
Toepper<atsutane at freethoughts.de> wrote:
> Hash: SHA224
> jezra wrote:
>> There is indeed a conflict of /usr/bin/sap. What is the best way to
>> proceed in a situation such as this? Should I rename my binary or
>> should I just put the name of the conflicting binary into "conflicts"?
> You should also rename your package, the current PKGBUILD conflicts itself.
> - --
> Jabber: atsutane at freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/
> Key: 295AFBF4     FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> iFYEARELAAYFAkpTeFcACgkQOeTxfyla+/TtKgDfVClv3hniaQw7HEeh2Fbu7TV8
> TJXrN43Qi/l6rADfXCaBjSIhUOC6Xs48sos5BdN1DUp38+4pLIoBXQ==
> =INkt

Unfortunately, after renaming the package and the compiled binary, I
needed to edit and rename the man page and the associated help
directives in the source code to reflect the changes to the package
and binary name. Since I don't wish to step on anyone toes regarding
application name collision, I'll hold off on submitting the PKGBUILD.

More information about the aur-general mailing list