[aur-general] AVR toolchain update

[Allan McRae]

bardo wrote:
> I've been delaying this update for quite a while. At the moment I've
> got a working binutils-avr, and I'm trying to make gcc work. I'm still
> not on the 4.4 train, which IIRC introduced the gcc-libs package. I
> have to admit that the gcc-libs role is not really clear to me, and
> I'm not sure I need an AVR-compiled version, but my gcc-avr build
> still fails and I don't know why, so I have no way to check. Can
> someone who knows more than me shed some light on this?
>   

You do not need a gcc-libs-avr as the whole puropse of you package is to 
privide the compiler.  gcc-libs was split so people did not need the 
compiler on their system.

If you post some details about the build failure you are having, I may 
be able to help.

Allan