[aur-general] Initial manual cleanup

[Xyne]

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:32:12 -0700
Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:

> Renaming packages is no longer necessary. In fact, the scripts require the
> arch in the package now. You're using the same scripts which run the
> official repos, so they should do things correctly.
> 
> Note that existing packages are fine, but all packages in the future MUST
> have the arch in the package name

How are packages for "any" architecture currently handled? Are they
duplicated for each architecture-specific repo?