[aur-general] AUR Moving

[Aaron Griffin]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Loui Chang<louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon 29 Jun 2009 16:09 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Evangelos Foutras<foutrelis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Monday 29 June 2009 18:03:50 Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta<abhidg at gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >From the ftp://archlinux.org/community/os/i686 page
>> >>>>
>> >>>> community.db.tar.gz. . . . . . . Jun 27 18:01
>> >>>> so it hasn't been updated at all since the AUR move. If the
>> >>>> new [community] repo is at the new server, then what's the
>> >>>> link to access the repofiles, or does gerolde sync the packages
>> >>>> back to itself? Since the mirrors all sync from archlinux.org they'll
>> >>>> be getting the old community.db.tar.gz only.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually, this wasn't setup it seems - gerolde should be rsyncing the
>> >>> repo back to itself.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll get to this today
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Btw: The new website is prety slow for me. Is there some configuration
>> >> issue with mysql or php? Maybe forgot to isntall apc or mysql cache to
>> >> small?
>> >>
>> >
>> > I've noticed this as well, as have several other Devs/TUs and also a
>> > user[1]. It looks like a networking issue (i.e. the load on the server is
>> > not excessive).
>> >
>> > @Aaron (or whoever has contact with the host): Is it possible to have the
>> > company providing the server look into this?
>> >
>> > [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75047
>>
>> It's weird that it seems to work fine for me:
>> $ ping aur.archlinux.org
>> ...
>> --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics ---
>> 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8996ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.244/12.402/12.666/0.184 ms
>>
>> Is anyone from North America having issues? Is it a continental thing?
>
> I've noticed the connection issues. It seems to be an off and on thing.
> We should definitely investigate if it continues.

Maybe related, just got this email from SevenL:
-----
In our ongoing effort to improve the service experience, we will be
performing network maintenance on Tuesday June 30th at 6:30PM EDT.
This procedure will enhance the stability of our network and increase
the overall speed of our network.

You may experience a period of service inaccessibility while our
Network Administrators perform the maintenance. Downtime should be
limited to no more than 5 minutes throughout the scheduled maintenance
period.

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Procedure: Maintenance on Customer-Side Switches
Duration: 30 minutes
Start Time: 6:30PM EDT
Completion Time: 7:00PM EDT
Downtime: Loss of network connection lasting up to 5 minutes over a
30-minute span
-----