[aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions
garoth at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 20:44:36 EDT 2009
It's been mentioned to me that several bugs are open around these
issues, and if this indeed the case, I believe it valuable to bring
attention to them -- a mailing list cannot hurt.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:35, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> What we could do is simply ship nvi instead, for that purpose, and
>>> stick with only two packages, vim and gvim. That would help things
> I just realized this was on the aur-general list. Silly place for this
> Can we move this to the bug tracker?
More information about the aur-general