[aur-general] package remove request

[Andrei Thorp]

Also, is it bad to name stuff like openoffice.org3?

I mean, 3 is the latest, right? What happens when 4 comes out? Aren't
versions already in the package...

-AT

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>>
>> On 25/05/2009, Nick F0x <f0x at f0x.ru> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> there are 2 PKGBUILD of one office suite - "OpenOffice.org russian
>>> build from infraresource".
>>> I mantain one of them openoffice.org3-infra-ru
>>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20967), second -
>>> openoffice-infra-ru (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10301)
>>> is orphaned.
>>> i think openoffice-infra-ru must be removed as duplicate.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Why you didn't adopt the openoffice-infra-ru package instead of added a
>> new one?
>>
>> IMHO you should adopt openoffice-infra-ru and update it with your
>> pkgbuild, then I (or a TU) will remove openoffice3-infra-ru from AUR.
>>
>
> I was a bit trigger-happy and removed openoffice-infra-ru. :(
>
> The files are still available at
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openoffice-infra-ru/ though. So, if Nick
> F0x agrees, it can be re-uploaded and maintained by him.
>