[aur-general] status of libtool slaying

Ray Rashif schivmeister at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 03:29:12 EST 2009

2009/11/11 Ronald van Haren <pressh at gmail.com>

> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Ray Rashif <schivmeister at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I remember the consensus used to be !libtool by default and now it's
> libtool
> > in makepkg.conf, so what happened?
> >
> some packages need the libtool files to function properly if that is
> what you mean.
> Ronald

I mean, that was always the case:

So the default for some time was to get rid of them, but in the event a
package did need its libtool files, then we used options=('libtool'), right?
But of course, there aren't many that install libtool files unnecessarily
now, so that's good. Just curious, in case I missed anything.

More information about the aur-general mailing list