[aur-general] too many opera packages
doorknob60 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 00:49:14 EST 2009
I agree, similar situation as chromium packages used to be, just waaay too
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Stefan Husmann
<stefan-husmann at t-online.de>wrote:
> Nuno André Jeremias de Aniceto schrieb:
> In the AUR discussion forum, I (quarkup) proposed to make a cleanup on the
>> opera packages.
>> the forum topic is this and it is active:
>> you may find some more of the details in the forum
>> there is the "opera" package along with the following ones (as explained
>> on the forum):
>> aur/opera 10.01-1
>> aur/opera-b1 10.10-1
>> aur/opera-beta 10.10-10
>> aur/opera-beta-qt4 10.00b3-1 (Out of Date)
>> aur/opera-bundled 10.01-3
>> aur/opera-dev 10.10_4694-1
>> aur/opera-devel-qt4 10.10_4685-1 (Out of Date)
>> aur/opera-dev-qt4 10.00_4493-2 (Out of Date)
>> aur/opera-g4 LATEST-3
>> aur/opera-qt3 9.64-1
>> aur/opera-qt4 10.00-6 (Out of Date)
>> aur/opera-shared-b1 10.10-1
>> aur/opera-static 9.64-1 (Out of Date)
>> aur/opera-unite-devel-qt3 10.00_4440-3 (Out of Date)
>> many of these packages are out of date or are duplicateds.
>> Please check the proposal on the forum.
> opera-beta-qt4 was deleted, because it was orphaned and a duplicate. The
> author requested deletion in the comments.
> Please, if you are interested, read the forum thread. An Opera employee is
> doing delightfull comments there.
> Regards Stefan
More information about the aur-general