[aur-general] Status of the Chromium/Chrome packages on AUR

Panos Filip panosfilip at gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 23:21:49 EST 2009


On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Ionut Biru <ibiru at archlinux.org> wrote:

> On 11/28/2009 05:47 AM, Panos Filip wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Panos Filip<panosfilip at gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Panos Filip<panosfilip at gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>>  OK, I think we are gonna see new packages coming.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux-chromeos/
>>>>
>>>> Guess what ... :p
>>>>
>>>>
>>> OK, as I knew, we are gonna have new packages again:
>>>
>>> 1) chromiumos-bin http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32290
>>> 2) chromium-os-bin http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32118
>>>
>>> The first one .... hmm... is a copy of a PKGBUILD I uploaded on
>>> bbs.archlinux.org based on chromium-browser-bin. The user didn't seem to
>>> be interested on uploading the sources (chromium-browser.desktop
>>> chromium-browser.png
>>> chromium-browser.sh
>>> LICENSE.txt) as well, and renamed accordingly.
>>>
>>> The second one is more proper, but has to be renamed.
>>>
>>> That means: we "need"* the (2) but with the (1)'s name.
>>>
>>>
>>> *We don't really need the chromium-os chromium interface as standalone
>>> packages, only the standalone browser.
>>>
>>>
>> And a duplicate of (2)
>>
>> 3) chromium-os-browser-bin http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32291
>>
>
> deleted 1) and 3)
>

Does chromium-os-bin work for you ? Is it really necessary to keep at least
one  on AUR ?


More information about the aur-general mailing list